Showing posts with label Mormon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mormon. Show all posts

12 Jun 2011

US 1st Amendment was not intended to protect crimes but religious institutions say it gives them the right to protect child abusers



Huffington Post   -   June 11, 2011

Churches Use 'Free Exercise' Defense To Block Abuse Cases

By Cecile S. Holmes  |  Religion News Service



(RNS) Jeremiah Scott was 11 when the abuse and molestation began in 1990 at the hands of an elder in his Mormon church in Portland, Ore. After the man died in 1995, Scott's mother sued the church in 1998 for putting her son at risk.

His mother said when she reported the abuse of Brother Frank Curtis to church authorities, she was told they already knew about it. Digging deeper, her attorneys discovered molestation claims against Curtis that stretched across state lines and went back decades.

But the church employed a unique legal defense: As a religious institution, church leaders said they were protected by the First Amendment's separation of church and state from having to surrender personnel files, victims' complaints or other documents.

Attorneys representing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints argued its records were protected by clergy-penitent privilege and the First Amendment's protection of the "free exercise" of religion.

Though the case was eventually settled in 2001, journalist Lisa Davis says the case represents a profound misuse -- and misunderstanding -- of the freedoms afforded to religious institutions under the Constitution.

And while a $3 million settlement may have ended the case for Scott and Curtis, it did not resolve the sticky First Amendment issues, Davis argues in her recent book, "The Sins of Brother Curtis."

"Everything was a fight in the case," said Davis, who teaches journalism at Santa Clara University and who has written for media outlets in Phoenix and San Francisco.

"Most states have a provision for clergy confidentiality. The idea being that we want to allow people to unburden themselves to their religious leader. It's designed for a confessional situation. It's not designed for a person coming to any church leader saying I'm worried about my child."

Legal scholars say that nearly 10 years after the Catholic abuse scandal highlighted the depth and breadth of the abuse of minors, the lines of authority between church and state remain murky when it comes to criminal acts.

"As important as the constitutional grounding is, there is rarely a complete prohibition for wrongs committed within the four corners of the church," says Brent Walker, an attorney and head of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.

Legal scholars say church bodies -- from Catholic dioceses to entire denominations -- often try to use the First Amendment to block victims' attorneys from accessing internal documents. In a case now headed for the U.S. Supreme Court, a religious school has tried to use the First Amendment to stave off an employment discrimination suit filed by a teacher.

"There hasn't been much written about these First Amendment issues because the focus has been on the victims and the abuse," said Marci Hamilton, legal scholar at New York's Benjamin Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University.

Church attorneys tried to use the First Amendment to block prosecutors in several ways as the Catholic clergy sex abuse web unwound, said Leslie Griffin, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Houston.

"There were claims that a lot of the documents were protected and then we go into litigation," Griffin said. "Their reading of the First Amendment is that it allows no government interference of religion, no government intrusion, no government review."

In the Curtis case, other legal arguments emerged around the idea of redemption -- an idea that is as central to religious teaching as private confessions made between a priest and his bishop.

"Frank Curtis had been found out (as a molester) in the 1980s and had been excommunicated by the church when it was found out," Davis said. "But he went through a process of repentance and was re-baptized."

That redemption process again gave Curtis access to children as a Sunday school teacher and Scout leader. In court, LDS lawyers said the church had a constitutionally protected right to believe in Curtis' redemption.

"This became known as the clean slate argument. The idea was he had emerged after baptism with a clean slate," Davis said.

Citizens are free to believe whatever they like, Davis said, but actions are governed by the law. And while the Constitution protects belief, and sometimes practice, it does not protect criminal actions.

One question that courts will have to wrestle with, scholars say, is whether putting someone in a position of authority is an extension of belief. Up until about 20 years ago, most states assumed the First Amendment barred anyone from bringing a claim against clergy, said Hamilton, the New York scholar.

"That theory was ... you could not go after the church because of one bad apple," she said. "But the more we've learned about clergy abuse cases, the more we're learning about the role the churches have played in covering up abuse and furthering that abuse."

"As the courts have become more educated, they have come to understand that religious institutions have to be held liable, and that the First Amendment was never intended as a protection for this kind of behavior."

This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES:




Mormon church leaders claim clergy privilege and say they had no duty to report sex abuse of teen to police


Children's rights lawyer criticizes Mormon church's child protection policies, but church claims it has gold standard


Summary of US State legislation on the issue of clergy as mandated reporters of child abuse and neglect


Nevada Supreme Court considers liability of churches in abuse suits; 1st Amendment not a defense in most other states


Child protection policies vary from church to church, but spotty compliance continues to endanger children


Book reveals Mormon church protected known pedophile priest, aggressively fought victims in court


Mormon leaders won't be charged with failing to report baby molester because of Idaho's clergy privilege law


Trapped in a Mormon Gulag


Order to release financial data has LDS Church, courts on collision course


Phoenix pastors charged for not reporting incest to authorities, told girls to make amends with their father

Posted by Perry Bulwer at 13:48
12 comments Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Jun 2011

Mormon fundamentalist leader must testify in tax case and reveal details of polygamy and child brides in Bountiful



Vancouver Sun  -  Canada    June 8, 2011

Polygamous leader's tax trial set for January


By Daphne Bramham | Vancouver Sun



Polygamous leader Winston Blackmore will testify under oath for the first time about his ‘lifestyle’ during his 12-day trial in federal Tax Court begins Jan. 23, 2012.

Blackmore had asked for an unprecedented ban on the publication and use of any witness testimony or evidence related to polygamy during his tax trial so that none of that information could be used against him in any future criminal trial. His motion was denied by Judge Campbell Miller. Blackmore is not appealing the decision and now has three months to pay the $50,000 in court costs that Miller ordered him to pay.

Polygamy is illegal in Canada, but the law is under review by Chief Justice Robert Bauman of the B.C. Supreme Court, who was asked by the B.C. government to determine if the criminal sanction is constitutional since the Charter of Rights guarantees religious freedom and freedom of expression.

Blackmore’s unprecedented request was denied earlier this month, clearing the way for his trial which is also a precedent-setting case to determine how he and his extended family ought to be taxed.

Blackmore is appealing the reassessment of his personal income tax filings for 2002 to 2006 that concluded he had under-estimated his earnings by $1.5 million and the $147,000 he was assessed in penalties.

At issue is whether Blackmore’s large family (which includes 19 or more wives and more than 130 children), plus his extended family of siblings and their multiple wives and children constitute a "congregation" for tax purposes.

The government of Canada says they don’t. Up until 2002 when he was ex-communicated by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Blackmore was the bishop of the congregation in Bountiful, B.C. Since then, the government says he and his family are not "a constituent part of any religious organization."

In Tax Court, it’s up to the taxpayer to prove that the government’s interpretation is wrong. So, it will be up to Blackmore, his wives and others to prove that they all lived and worked together and share beliefs. And under cross-examination, lawyers for Canada will be able to ask questions about all of that including how many wives Blackmore had during the disputed tax years and where they all lived.

This article was found at:

http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/thinktank/archive/2011/06/08/polygamous-leader-s-tax-trial-set-for-january.aspx

*********************************************************************
CBC News - Canada June 3, 2011

Polygamist leader to testify at tax trial



The testimony of polygamist leader Winston Blackmore at his tax trial won't be protected by a publication ban, meaning the public may soon learn much more about the inner workings of the polygamous community of Bountiful, B.C.

Blackmore is facing charges in federal court in Vancouver for allegedly owing up to $1 million in back taxes. At issue is whether his community qualifies as a religious congregation under the law.

Blackmore had specifically asked the court to ban the publication of testimony related to polygamy. His lawyer told the court Blackmore is worried such evidence could be used against him in a potential criminal prosecution.

But Justice Campbell Miller ruled Blackmore himself has given numerous interviews on the subject and also found any criminal proceedings that might arise would be too far in the future to prejudice a jury.

The judge has also declined Blackmore's request that he be immune from criminal prosecution for any evidence he gives in the tax case.

Details about polygamist community expected

CBC lawyer Dan Burnett says once the trial gets underway, it will be the first time Blackmore will be compelled to testify under oath at a trial.

"I expect you're going to hear some information about the practices and approaches and beliefs in the community we haven't heard before," Burnett said.

"There will be no restriction on the public being able to hear and see all the evidence as to the issue in the case, which even though it's a tax case, it's about whether Bountiful is a congregation within the meaning of the Tax Act, and that's going to get into what beliefs they share spiritually and all that."

The trial was set to begin Monday but was postponed while the judge ruled on Blackmore's request for a publication ban. Blackmore could still appeal Friday's decision, and a new date for the start of the trial has yet to be set.

No ruling on polygamy laws

B.C. Crown lawyer Craig Jones has said it's no secret Blackmore is a polygamist, and the tax case will force him to talk about marriages among 12- and 13-year-olds in the community.

Blackmore could still face criminal charges in connection with his marriages, even though two past attempts to prosecute him for polygamy have failed.

The chief justice of the B.C. Supreme Court is expected to rule later this year on the constitutionality of the law banning polygamy following a special months-long hearing in Vancouver that ended in April.

Chief Justice Robert Bauman spent several months hearing testimony and legal arguments about whether the prohibition against multiple marriages is constitutional, and much of the case focused on allegations of abuse in the small religious commune of Bountiful.

If Bauman rules the ban on polygamy is permissible under the Charter or Rights, the B.C. government is likely to renew its prosecution of Blackmore, it has indicated.


This article was found at:


*********************************************************************

Vancouver Sun  -  June 4, 2011

Tax Court gets interesting when polygamist comes to town

Winston Blackmore denied a sweeping publication ban that would have shielded evidence and testimony from the public eye

By Daphne Bramham


The federal Tax Court is a genteel place, a white-collar court where the only crime being tried is tax evasion.

Unlike provincial courts, no sheriffs in bulletproof vests stand guard. Instead, a single commissionaire sits behind a desk on the sixth floor of an office building at the heart of downtown Vancouver.

He politely asks people to hang up their coats and leave umbrellas and bags in the closet. That done, he reminds them to turn cellphones off.

But high-profile polygamist Winston Blackmore brought some chaos into the calm world this week, along with his tax troubles, of which he has $1.5 million worth for the years 2000 to 2006.

He asked for unprecedented shielding of evidence and testimony. He wanted a publication ban and an order from Judge Campbell Miller that none of it could be used in any future criminal trial involving polygamy.

And if that weren't possible, Blackmore asked that his tax trial be adjourned until after the reference case on the constitutionality of Canada's polygamy law is finally determined or until any future criminal trial (with him as the defendant) was completed.

He didn't get any of it. But if his intent was to delay, that much he got at a price of $50,000 to be paid to the Department of Justice for its costs.

Blackmore's audacious motion attracted journalists and their lawyers as well as lawyers from B.C.'s attorney-general's ministry.

In Courtroom 601, where arcane sections of Canada's thick tax acts are normally debated and parsed, Craig Jones (B.C.'s lead lawyer in the polygamy reference case) raised the spectre of child brides and human trafficking victims.

If Miller were to grant such an unprecedented shield on evidence, Jones argued that Miller could be thwarting prosecutions of those crimes as well if he granted Blackmore's request.

The Tax Court judge made it clear that none of this made him happy. He wasn't happy that the motion was filed two working days before the trial's scheduled start, even though two weeks earlier Blackmore's lawyer David Davies had assured Miller there were no impediments to the trial.

The judge wasn't happy with media lawyers and a lawyer from the B.C. attorney-general's ministry in his court.

It's not that Miller -a legal scholar with a master's degree in law (first class) from Cambridge University -wasn't up to dealing with this unprecedented motion.

Even though several times, the judge expressed surprise at the "paucity of jurisprudence on incriminating evidence from civil suits being used in criminal matters," it took him only one day to craft his crisp, oral decision rendered Friday.

Miller denied every aspect of Blackmore's motion even as he expressed "real concern" that the government could use the Tax Court "as fertile, fact-finding territory" to gather evidence for criminal charges against polygamists or drug dealers.

He said citizens are already disadvantaged in Tax Court because the onus is on them to "demolish" the assumptions the government makes in its tax assessments.

Miller did rule that Blackmore is a "compellable witness" even though Davies didn't ask for that.

The judge said it could provide Blackmore some protection from evidence being used to incriminate him in a future trial.

Further, Miller suggested Davies subpoena witnesses to support Blackmore's contention that he, his family and other residents of Bountiful constitute a "congregation." That way, Miller said, the witnesses can argue in any future criminal trial that their testimony was not freely given.

Although agreeing that Blackmore raised an important issue of selfincrimination in civil courts, Miller objected to his timing and ordered Blackmore to pay $50,000 to the government for extra costs incurred by the trial's delay.

He didn't, however, agree with the government that no trial be set until the bill is paid, even though the government has reason for concern that Blackmore's cheque might not arrive. In April 2010, Blackmore had $5.68 million in debt and only $867,000 in assets, according to an affidavit filed in B.C. Supreme Court. He was pleading penury to support an unsuccessful attempt to have taxpayers fund his participation in the constitutional reference case.

Miller gave Davies until Wednesday to get Blackmore's instructions regarding an appeal of the Friday ruling. If there's no appeal, a trial date will be set.

With all that decided, the Tax Court then returned to normal -at least until Blackmore's trial begins.


This article was found at:

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Court+gets+interesting+when+polygamist+comes+town/4893305/story.html


RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG

Mormon fundamentalist asks court to prevent evidence in tax trial from being used in criminal cases related to polygamy

Mormon fundamentalist leader asks court to exclude evidence against him in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy

Mormon polygamists seek immunity from future prosecution before giving evidence in Canadian constitutional case

Judge will allow anonymous testimony from Mormon polygamists in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy

Decision in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy months away but evidence renews police investigation

Author who escaped abuse in US polygamy cult explains why Canadian constitutional case is so important in both countries

Stop Polygamy in Canada website has notes taken by observers in the courtroom as well as links to most of the affidavits and research the court is considering in this case.

FLDS lawyer's closing argument in constitutional case on polygamy ignores children's right to religious freedom

Another closing argument in Canadian polygamy case claims religious freedom for adults trumps children's rights

Author gives overview of history of marriage in context of the Canadian constitutional case on polygamy law

Legal expert tells Canadian court polygamy prohibitions and monogamy tradition pre-date Christianity
 
 

Posted by Perry Bulwer at 10:48
93 comments Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Jun 2011

Mormon fundamentalist asks court to prevent evidence in tax trial from being used in criminal cases related to polygamy



Vancouver Sun - June 3, 2011

Judge denies polygamist leader's unprecedented request for evidence shield

By Daphne Bramham  |  Vancouver Sun



Canada's highest profile polygamist has not only lost in an attempt to win a sweeping ban on the use of evidence and witness testimony in federal Tax Court, Winston Blackmore was ordered to pay $50,000 in costs.

Winston Blackmore is appealing the Canada Revenue Service's re-assessment of five years of personal income tax filings and its conclusion that he under-estimated his income by $1.5 million. In addition to the re-assessment, the government ordered Blackmore to pay $147,000 in penalties.

The appeal is based on Blackmore's assertion that he, members of his family and other fundamentalist Mormons in Bountiful who accept him as their spiritual leader ought to be taxed as a congregation and not as individuals.

Only days before his case was to go to trial, Blackmore filed a motion asking for the publication ban and a shield on use of evidence and witness testimony in any future criminal prosecution related to polygamy. [see related articles below]

On Friday, Judge Campbell Miller ruled that there would be no ban on publication of evidence and witness testimony; no restriction on future use of the evidence and witness testimony; and, no further delay in the tax trial.

Blackmore was not in court.

In his oral judgment, Miller said Blackmore and his lawyer David Davies fell “well short” of proving the necessity for a publication ban, noting that in the past Blackmore has not shied from publicity and has been open in discussing his polygamous lifestyle.

As for restricting future use of evidence and witness testimony, Miller admitted his concern that the government attempting to use evidence from a civil matter in a criminal case. But he refused to make a precedent setting order that might be viewed as expanding a tax-court appellant's Charter rights.

However, Miller did rule that Blackmore is a “compellable witness” in the Tax Court. Even though Blackmore has brought the tax appeal, Miller noted that reverse onus that tax court puts on citizens appealing their tax assessments gives Blackmore no choice but to testify.

As a compellable witness, Blackmore could argue in a criminal trial that using his testimony and evidence in Tax Court would violate his Charter rights as well as both the Canada and B.C. Evidence acts.

However, Miller noted that there is no guarantee that a judge in a criminal trial would agree and advised that was a risk assessment Blackmore would have to weigh in determining whether to pursue his appeal.

Blackmore's motion was filed only two working days before his two-week trial was scheduled to begin, forcing its adjournment, the judge ordered Blackmore to pay $50,000 for the Department of Justice's lost costs in preparing for a trial that now may be as much as a year away.

A date for a new trial could be set next Wednesday. That's when Miller has asked Davies to advise him and government counsel Lynn Burch of whether Blackmore intends to appeal Friday's ruling. If Blackmore does appeal, Miller said there's no point in setting a trial date until there's an indication of when the appeal might be heard.

This article was found at:

http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/thinktank/archive/2011/06/03/judge-denies-polygamist-leader-s-unprecedented-request-for-evidence-shield.aspx




**************************************************************************


Courthouse News Service - May 31, 2011

Polygamist Wants Evidence Protected

By DARRYL GREER


VANCOUVER, B.C. (CN) - As British Columbia's Supreme Court wrestles with the murky legal status of polygamy in Canada, the leader of a British Columbian polygamous community wants the Tax Court of Canada to restrict the use of evidence used in a tax trial in possible subsequent criminal proceedings.
 
Winston Blackmore filed a notice of motion with the Tax Court of Canada naming Her Majesty the Queen as a respondent. Blackmore, in appealing a tax assessment, seeks orders "restricting the publication of any evidence of any witness for the Appellant in the trial of this matter relating to polygamy, plural marriage, 'celestial marriage' (as it is sometimes referred to) or similar practices." 

He also seeks an order directing the government to "not use nor make available to any person or entity for the purposes of prosecution" evidence given by witnesses in the upcoming tax trial relating to polygamy. 

According to the motion, witnesses in the tax trial fear that evidence given about living arrangements and other information about the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints may be used in criminal trials after the B.C. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of criminal laws against polygamy. 

Polygamy laws in the country were long held by legal experts to be unconstitutional under religious freedom provisions in Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, leading the B.C. government to ask the province's Supreme Court to rule on the law's constitutionality last year. 

Blackmore claims his tax assessment appeal will set a precedent "for the appropriate tax treatment of the Bountiful congregation." 

The government, according to the motion, claims that the people of Bountiful are not part of a legitimate religious organization, and given "the polygamous nature of the purported congregation's familial arrangements, any allocation of trust income to families on this basis would be contrary to the intention of Parliament." 

"The outcome of the Appellant's appeal will affect all members of the congregation. The Appellant is thereby practically compelled to testify and to call other witnesses from Bountiful or with first-hand knowledge of Bountiful during the relevant years in order to provide direct evidence of the living arrangements in Bountiful and of the congregation's religious characteristics and affiliations," the motion states. "In short, the evidence of the Witnesses is crucial to the Appellant's case, yet absent the Orders sought, the Witnesses' choice is to incriminate themselves of concede the [tax] assessments under appeal." 

Blackmore is represented by David R. Davies and S. Natasha Reid.

Bountiful, in southeastern British Columbia, has existed for more than 50 years, but has been known as Bountiful only since the 1980s. It has found itself uncomfortably in the media spotlight repeatedly during the past several years.
This article was found at:


*************************************************************************

Vancouver Sun  -  June 1, 2011

Blackmore wants a publication ban on evidence in tax case

Notorious polygamist's motion also asks for a court order shielding witness from prosecution for polygamy under Criminal Code

By Daphne Bramham, Vancouver Sun


It's a highly unusual request in the bizarre and unprecedented tax case involving Canada's notorious polygamist, Winston Blackmore, and his family.

The case, which provides a glimpse of how one man is able to afford more than 100 children and more than two dozen wives, was to have been heard over two weeks starting Monday in federal Tax Court in Vancouver.

But on Thursday, Blackmore and his lawyers filed a motion seeking a sweeping publication ban on "any evidence of any witness ... relating to polygamy, plural marriage, 'celestial marriage' (as it is sometimes referred to) or similar practices including any evidence given on examination of discovery or in response to undertakings."

The motion, which is being heard this morning, also asks for a court order shielding those witnesses from prosecution for polygamy either under the existing Criminal Code section or "any successor section that might result from the pending decision in the constitutional reference case that was heard in B.C. Supreme Court."

A decision in that case is still pending.

Blackmore has never denied being a polygamist.

He's had at least 19 "wives," has more than 100 children - at least 40 of whom are under 18, according to Blackmore's affidavit sworn in a different case that was heard in B.C. Supreme Court.

But without the publication ban and a shield from criminal prosecution, Blackmore says no witnesses will testify.

Without their testimony about their religious doctrine of polygamy and the living arrangements within the family and the broader fundamentalist Mormon community of Bountiful, Blackmore argues that it won't be possible to convince the court that they ought to be taxed as a congregation and not as individuals.

"In short, the evidence of the witnesses is crucial," the motion says. "[Y]et absent the orders sought, the witnesses' choice is to incriminate themselves or concede the assessments under appeal."

Between 2000 and 2006, the government claims that Blackmore underestimated by $1.7 million the income, employee and shareholder benefits he received from J.R. Blackmore and Sons, of which he is president.

It's not clear how much Blackmore owes if the reassessment is upheld.

However, the assessed gross negligence penalties total just under $149,000.

In the years covered by the reassessment, Blackmore's claimed income never exceeded $45,000 and was "far too little to financially support him, his purported polygamous 'wives' and the many children issued from those relationships," according to the government's amended pleadings.

What Blackmore did was have the company pay his own and his family's personal and living expenses.

For example, according to the government, the company paid a salary to Ruth Lane, one of Blackmore's wives, even though she did no work for the company.

It paid tuition for the University of Calgary, expenses and a salary to his son, Joseph.

It paid for a Cessna aircraft, its maintenance and fuel, even though the company used it only 20 per cent of the time.

The company paid property taxes and garbage removal fees for accommodation used by family members as well as their automobile insurance, vehicle allowances, gas, electricity and telephone bills.

Restaurant meals, hockey tickets and rink rentals charged to Blackmore's credit cards were paid by the company. From 1992 to 2002, Blackmore and his family even received shareholder dividends.

Blackmore claims it was all done for the greater good of the congregation.

But the government says, the majority of Bountiful's 1,000 residents had no role in the company's business and that it "operated for the primary benefit" of Winston Blackmore.

Yet, even if the judge eventually determines that Bountiful is a congregation, the government says Blackmore still didn't claim anything close to what he earned in salary and benefits and never paid the taxman anywhere near what he owes.

And nor did other members of his family.

This article was found at:



******************************************************************************

Globe and Mail  -  June 1, 2011

Blackmore seeks publication ban on polygamy details in tax court

KEVEN DREWS  |  The Canadian Press



VANCOUVER— Details of child brides and the polygamist way of life in Bountiful, B.C., could burst into the public domain in unprecedented detail thanks to the tax man.

Winston Blackmore, one of the leaders of the breakaway Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in the province’s southeast, has been assessed hundreds of thousands of dollars in back taxes and penalties.

He’s fighting the assessment in federal tax court.

But before the proceedings could begin, Mr. Blackmore’s lawyer, David Davies, asked the court Wednesday to ban from publication details related to polygamy.

He also asked the court to ensure any evidence heard during the trial can’t be used in any future criminal trials.

Mr. Davies said the orders would protect Mr. Blackmore’s future rights to a fair trial and the administration of justice.

But B.C. Crown lawyer Craig Jones said the application is really about keeping evidence of criminality, specifically child marriage, out of the public domain and subsequent courts.

“It’s no secret he’s a polygamist,” said Mr. Jones of Mr. Blackmore.

Mr. Jones said that under cross-examination, Mr. Blackmore will have to talk about marriages to 12- and 13-year-olds.

“And that’s going to get someone’s attention.”

Mr. Jones said authorities in Canada, Utah and Texas are conducting ongoing investigations into the sect’s activities.

“That’s what this is about,” Mr. Jones said.

A B.C. Supreme Court judge is considering Canada’s 121-year-old ban on polygamy.

This past January, the RCMP announced a renewed criminal investigation focusing on Bountiful after the B.C. Supreme Court heard evidence that teenaged girls were taken across the Canada-U.S. border to be married.

Church records seized in the United States outline the marriage of more than two dozen girls who were as young as 12.

Meantime, Mr. Blackmore’s legal battle with tax authorities has been taking place since the 2000 tax year. As the dispute has worn on, Mr. Blackmore has amassed negligence penalties alone amounting to almost $150,000.

Crown documents filed in response to Mr. Blackmore’s appeal indicate Mr. Blackmore under-reported $1.85-million in income and employee and shareholder benefits received by J.R. Blackmore and Sons, Ltd.

Mr. Blackmore is the majority owner of the company.

In the documents, the Crown argues Mr. Blackmore’s reported earnings were “insufficient to financially support him, his purported polygamous ‘wives’ and the many children issued from those relationships.”

The Crown alleges credit card expenses, tuition for a son, rents, car insurance and hockey tickets, among other basic living expenses, were paid for by the company.

The documents also say the company paid a $41,000 salary to one of Mr. Blackmore’s wives in 2003 when she didn’t do any work for the company.

“The amounts expended by the company in respect of the personal and living expenses of its shareholders and their extended families was part of a purposeful and deliberate plan to reduce taxes at the corporate level and to benefit the shareholders’ extended families,” the Crown says in its court response to Mr. Blackmore.

Mr. Blackmore’s lawyers argue the company was a business agent of a Bountiful congregation.

Justice Campbell Miller of the Tax Court of Canada made no ruling on the application Wednesday.

He said while he expects to rule on the publication ban Friday, he may need more time to consider Mr. Blackmore’s application to ensure anything heard in tax court can’t be used against him in a criminal case.

This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG













FLDS lawyer's closing argument in constitutional case on polygamy ignores children's right to religious freedom



Another closing argument in Canadian polygamy case claims religious freedom for adults trumps children's rights





Evidence in Canadian polygamy case shows Mormon leader trafficked his daughters and other child brides to US

Religious practice not above the law, polygamy consumes its young says Attorney General of BC in closing argument

Summary of positions in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy as court begins hearing final oral arguments

Lawyer says extraordinary evidence in Canadian case shows polygamous society consumes children, harms women

A review of the Canadian constitutional case on polygamy after completion of testimonies

Canadian Muslim polygamists closely watching landmark constitutional case on Canadian polygamy law

Economics professor considers financial aspects of polygamy that create inequality

Legal expert tells Canadian court polygamy prohibitions and monogamy tradition pre-date Christianity

B.C. government expert in polygamy case sets out long list of social harms, societies that abandon polygamy do better

Polygamy expert tells court in constitutional case that it reduces women's freedom and equality and leads to forced marriage

Polygyny and Canada’s Obligations under International Human Rights Law (pdf)

Research paper submitted to B.C. court in constitutional case documents harms associated with polygamy

Bountiful evidence that polygamy harms women and children - constitutional case likely to reach Canadian Supreme Court

Some religious practices, such as polygamy, are inherently harmful and should not be tolerated in modern society 

Women's adovcates: polygamy is an “oppressive institution” that abuses and enslaves women and children

Prosecuting Polygamy in El Dorado by Marci Hamilton







Intellectual abuse of Mormon fundamentalist children means few will finish high school or go to college

Canadian polygamy case hears additional witnesses, school that intellectually abuses children given top ranking

Utah authorities say ruling in Canadian polygamy case will have no bearing on US law

Final arguments in Canadian constitutional hearing on polygamy will be broadcast on TV and Web

Closing arguments in Canadian polygamy case set for March 2011, but what about evidence of crimes exposed in testimony?

Canadian polygamy case hears evidence on high rates of teen pregnancies in fundamentalist Mormon community

Canadian polygamy case hears additional witnesses, school that intellectually abuses children given top ranking

Polygamy prohibition is a reasonable limit on religious freedom to protect the equality rights of women and children

A review of the Canadian constitutional case on polygamy after completion of testimonies

For Mormon polygamists in Canadian case religious freedom means enslaving women, sexualizing girls, exploiting boys

Two more plural wives testify in Canadian polygamy case, see no problem with forced marriage or trafficking child brides

Testimony of first FLDS witness in Canadian polygamy case reveals women in denial that their children are being abused

First anonymous FLDS witness in Canadian polygamy case paints cosy picture of plural marriage, seems oblivious to abuses

Affidavit in Canadian polygamy case reveals shocking statistics on child trafficking, child brides and teen mothers in Bountiful

Economics professor considers financial aspects of polygamy that create inequality

Two Mormon fundamentalist women from Utah tell Canadian court positive accounts of polygamy, no hint of abuse

Brother of FLDS bishop describes intellectual abuse, child labour, spiritual abuse and loveless religion in Canadian polygamy case

No freedom from religion for women and children in Mormon polygamist towns where men claim religious freedom to abuse

Mormon polygamist survivor tells court babies smothered to keep quiet, emotional and spiritual abuse worse than sex abuse

Video testimony by Mormon fundamentalist in Canadian court says polygamy provides happy life and harms no one

Survivor tells Canadian court extreme abuses including water torture of babies common in Mormon polygamist communities

FLDS bishop of Bountiful will not testify in Canadian polygamy case so his affidavit will not be read into record

Legal expert tells Canadian court polygamy prohibitions and monogamy tradition pre-date Christianity

The issue of women's rights in the Canadian constitutional review of the polygamy law

Another week of conflicting expert testimony as constitutional hearing on Canadian polygamy law continues

Before holiday break in constitutional case judge hears conflicting expert testimony on harms associated with polygamy

Expert in polygamy case says society should assume all members of sects have free choice, but what about children?

B.C. government expert in polygamy case sets out long list of social harms, societies that abandon polygamy do better

Court views video affidavits from Mormon fundamentalist survivors detailing pedophilia, incest, child trafficking and forced marriage

Polygamy expert tells court in constitutional case that it reduces women's freedom and equality and leads to forced marriage

Affidavits from survivors and psychologist's testimony in constitutional case show abusive nature of polygamous lifestyle

Expert witness in constitutional case on polygamy claims Bountiful women freely choose their own religious oppression

Judge allows controversial expert witness to testify in Canadian polygamy case, no decision yet on publication of video affidavits

Pro-polygamy intervenor groups make opening statements as first week of Canadian constitutional case ends

FLDS lawyer in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy claims members freely consent to plural marriage, abuse survivors disagree

Lawyer appointed to argue for striking down Canada's anti-polygamy law in constitutional case makes opening arguments

Canadian constitutional case on polygamy begins with BC government's opening statement

Unique Canadian constitutional case on polygamy set to begin November 22, 2010

Timeline of events leading up to Canadian constitutional case on polygamy which is set to begin

Survivor of abuse by Mormon polygamists documents accounts of sex crimes in the FLDS and other fundamentalist groups

Mormon fundamentalist leader asks court to exclude evidence against him in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy

Fundamentalist Mormon spokeswoman says polygamy doesn't hurt anyone

Mormon fundamentalist claims of religious persecution in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy not supported by the facts

Polygamist leader says BC attorney general guilty of religious persecution

Polygamist leader calls charges religious persecution

More persecution than prosecution

Second Mormon polygamist found guilty of child sex assault, jury doesn't buy defense claim of religious persecution

Claims of persecution ridiculous in societies where Christians have special privileges to indoctrinate children

More pro-polygamy affidavits by Mormon fundamentalists filed in Canadian constitutional case set to begin in November

Judge will allow anonymous testimony from Mormon polygamists in Canadian constitutional case on polygamy

Mormon polygamists seek immunity from future prosecution before giving evidence in Canadian constitutional case

Canadian constitutional case on polygamy triggered by Mormon fundamentalists, but will also examine Muslim communities

Utah law professor uses Mormon polygamists as example of how religious extremism leads to deliberate child abuse

Polygyny and Canada’s Obligations under International Human Rights Law (pdf)

Research paper submitted to B.C. court in constitutional case documents harms associated with polygamy

Man from Bountiful says girls in Mormon polygamist communities "treated like poison snakes", taught to obey men and have many children

Bountiful evidence that polygamy harms women and children - constitutional case likely to reach Canadian Supreme Court

Review of the positions 12 intervener groups are expected to take in upcoming Canadian constitutional case on polygamy

Some religious practices, such as polygamy, are inherently harmful and should not be tolerated in modern society 

Women's adovcates: polygamy is an “oppressive institution” that abuses and enslaves women and children







Posted by Perry Bulwer at 14:13
2 comments Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)