Showing posts with label discriminiation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discriminiation. Show all posts

1 Jun 2011

Children of Christian immigrants to Canada think they face more religious discrimination than Muslim immigrant children



Postmedia News   -  May 27, 2011

Study shows split between children of Christian, Muslim immigrants

BY SHANNON PROUDFOOT, POSTMEDIA NEWS




Evangelical Christian children of immigrants feel they can't openly practise their religion and worry that Christianity is no longer a guiding force in Canadian society, while Muslims say they're free to follow their faith in this country — but face other forms of discrimination.

Those are some of the intriguing findings of new research that will be presented on Sunday at the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences, the largest multi-disciplinary academic gathering in Canada.

"I was a little bit surprised by the degree to which Christians feel put upon. The 'Religulous' message is getting across and it's not a good message," said Peter Beyer, a professor of religious studies at the University of Ottawa, referring to the 2008 Bill Maher film that cast a critical eye on organized religion.

"They feel like there's prejudice against religious people: 'I can't pull out my Bible, I can't talk about my religion without getting shot down. I don't even mention it for fear of getting a bad reaction.' "

His study gathered insights from about 350 second-generation Canadians aged 18 to 30 through 36 focus groups in Sydney, N.S, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Edmonton and Vancouver.

Each focus group drew together young adults with common religious backgrounds, and many Christians expressed the worry that Christianity is no longer a dominant force in Canadian society, Beyer said.

On the other hand, Muslims attributed the discrimination they felt to racial or cultural prejudices rather than religious issues, saying they felt they could follow their faith unfettered in Canada.

"They feel that they're perfectly free to practice Islam here in Canada, unlike some of the Christians who feel that their ability to practise their religion is restricted in this country," Beyer said. "But they did feel Islamophobia."

The qualitative study reveals some of the complex fault lines in Canadian society.

Young adults from across religious and cultural lines agreed that Muslims have faced discrimination since 9/11, but non-Muslims also said there should be limits on religious freedom and expressed concerns that Muslims "could be a problem," Beyer said.

In terms of Canadian identity and culture, many children of immigrants couldn't define it, denied its existence or pinned it on the fuzzy notion of multiculturalism. But second-generation Canadians in Quebec had a strong sense of the province's unique identity — to the point that some identified as sovereigntists.

"They all had to do with the fact that there is a Quebecois culture and a sense of nationhood and something you can attach yourself to," Beyer said. "Whereas in the rest of Canada, we asked them what's a Canadian and we got a lot of answers such as, 'Who knows?' One group said there is no such thing as Canadian culture."

Second-generation Canadians are both optimistic and critical of the entire concept of multiculturalism in Canada, he said. They believe integrating and learning from each other could be a hugely positive experience that too often turns into immigrant communities living in "silos" side by side — and they blame their immigrant parents, not the rest of society, for that.

"One of the myths that's very much alive in Canada is that the United States is worse on every score," he said. "The idea that we live in a mosaic and they live in a melting pot, in spite of the fact that it's not true as far as the evidence shows — that's certainly believed by a lot of people."

Beyer will present his work Sunday at the Congress, which is jointly hoisted this year by the University of New Brunswick and St. Thomas University and expected to draw more than 6,000 delegates to Fredericton. The conference kicks off Saturday and runs until June 4.


This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG




Claims of persecution ridiculous in societies where Christians have special privileges to indoctrinate children












4 May 2011

Houston teacher suspended for making racial insult connecting American born Muslim student to Osama bin Laden



KTRK-TV/DT ABC13 - Houston, Texas May 3, 2011

Teacher disciplined over comment to Muslim student

by Cynthia Cisneros




HOUSTON (KTRK) -- The death of Osama bin Laden is related to an investigation of a teacher at Clear Brook High School. The teacher is accused of making a racially insensitive comment to a student in front of the entire class.

A Friendswood mom says she was offended by what her daughter says happened Monday in ninth grade algebra.

She said, "The teacher told the student that 'I bet you're grieving.' And she basically looked at him and said what are you talking about? And he said I heard about your uncle's death and she said wow, because she understood that he was referring about Osama bin Laden being killed and was racially profiling her."

The remark was made to a classmate, an American-born girl of Muslim faith. It happened at Clear Brook High School in the Clear Creek Independent School District. The mom wanted to speak out about the incident but wanted us to protect her identity, saying she doesn't want any retaliation against her daughter or the girl who experienced the inappropriate comment.

The mother said, "The student ended up crying over what was said to her by the teacher and the teacher asked her why she was crying and another student said it was because of what you said earlier. And his response was, oh, OK, and just kind of smirked and giggled and walked away."

The Clear Creek school district was quick to respond, confirming what was said and issuing a prepared statement.

"In the Clear Creek Independent School District, we believe diversity strengthens our community and seek opportunities to celebrate the different cultures within our schools and neighborhoods. The sentiments allegedly shared by this teacher are not reflective of the staff at Clear Brook High School or anyone within the Clear Creek Independent School District. In accordance with CCISD policy, the teacher has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of a personnel investigation.
The student did the right thing and immediately notified an adult regarding the teachers' comments. The principal at Clear Brook High School notified the child's parents and has been in communication with the family." - Elaina Polsen, Director of Public Information, Clear Creek Independent School District

The Islamic Society of Greater Houston agrees with the action, saying they believe the incident is isolated. The group does not call for any further response.

"A lot of people are ignorant in the world, and so you just have to ignore them," suggested Dr. Aziz Siddiqui with the Islamic Society of Greater Houston.

Meanwhile, the Friendswood mom read a text she received from the girl.

She read, "Make it a lesson learned about how the world is going through stuff and he needs to watch what he says and so do others because Osama does not represent the whole Muslim faith."

The mom says that the girl remains in class and she is grateful that her classmates stuck up for her.


This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG:




Arkansas teacher told to stop praying with students and posting or passing out Bible verses


Christian school Principal's misconduct was physically, emotionally and intellectually abusive


Ohio school district payed nearly a million dollars to fire science teacher who taught creationism


Hearing for Ohio science teacher sacked for evangelizing and teaching anti-science shows great divide in U.S. society


Teacher Accused of Branding Kid With Cross

26 Apr 2011

UK teacher's union says endemic homophobic bullying in schools likely to rise as faith schools increase



The Independent - UK April 26, 2011

Faith schools are failing to challenge 'endemic' homophobia, teachers say

By Richard Garner, Education Editor




Homophobic bullying in schools is "endemic" and likely to rise with the impending growth in the number of faith schools, teachers warn.

The Catholic Church has already openly criticised the nationally agreed code of conduct for teachers that requires them to "proactively challenge discrimination" in school, teachers claim.

Delegates at the National Union of Teachers' conference in Harrogate added that the failure to tackle discrimination would be exacerbated by the setting up of new "free" schools – many run by religious groups – from September.

A motion overwhelmingly backed by delegates said: "Some religious schools believe they are above the law and can do anything that they believe is line with their religious beliefs."

Dave Brinson, of the union's executive, told the conference: "Discrimination, intolerance and bigotry have not gone away. They're still there and they still need to be challenged."

The motion, which also called on the union to conduct an investigation into discrimination in faith schools, was not "anti-faith schools", he said.

There were many that did a good job in combating prejudice – but there were others, "both faith-based and secular that don't challenge homophobia and discrimination".

Annette Pryce, from Buckinghamshire, said: "Homophobia is insidious for both staff and pupils – more so in faith schools."

Deborah Gwynn, from St Helens, Lancashire, revealed details of a survey which showed that 40 per cent of teachers had heard pupils use homophobic words on a daily basis. Less than half the teachers surveyed believed their schools had an effective policy for combating homophobia.

"We have to challenge the use of homophobic language by students no matter how innocent it might seem," she added. "People are using the word 'gay' and they are meaning boring, stupid or rubbish. How are you going to feel if people are using that word on a daily basis to mean something like that? We all have to challenge the use of the word 'gay' in this context."

A survey carried out by the School Health Unit for Stonewall, a lobby group on behalf of gays and lesbians, showed that almost two-thirds of gay pupils had suffered homophobic bullying at school. Of those who had been bullied, 41 per cent had been physically attacked and 17 per cent had received death threats. Half had missed schooling as a result.

Michael Dance, of Redbridge, spoke of his sorrow at seeing an ambulance coming to his school for a gay pupil who had suffered a panic attack as a result of bullying.

Leaders of the union added that teachers in faith schools could also suffer discrimination as a result of legislation that allowed heads to appoint staff on religious grounds. This could lead to favouring teachers of the particular faith of the school in promotions and appointments.

They warned that if a school did not tackle discrimination it could send a negative message to gay and lesbian pupils. "If a school has not got that commitment that our school is a safe place for all and does not challenge discrimination, the message gets through," said Mr Brinson.

"If you have a school that's not taking this problem seriously, [pupils] don't feel comfortable and feel they aren't going to be supported."

The motion warned that some schools were "unlawfully" using their faith status to avoid implementing equality policy.

It added that the conference was "alarmed by the Government's plans to push through academies and free schools" and called on the union to oppose "all groups who promote discrimination whether it is on religious grounds, e.g. evangelical Christian academies, or ideological grounds".

Of the first 11 "free" schools approved by the Education Secretary, Michael Gove, four were faith-based. Those applying to set up free schools included evangelical Christians who wanted to give their school a creationist ethos, and Muslims.

Dr Oonagh Stannard, the chief executive of the Catholic Board of Education, said it had been able to support the profession's code of conduct.

"Any form of bullying is completely unacceptable," she added. "Catholic schools have been noted for their low incidence of bullying."


This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG:




Extremist Catholic sect protesters bully Brown University students with anti-gay hate speech


Religions that teach homosexuality is a sin are real bullies engaging in spiritual terrorism


Religiously inspired disdain and hatred of gay people leads to bullying and death of vulnerable youth


Ex-gay therapy is child abuse and those who practice it have blood on their hands


UK psychotherapist faces discipline hearing for using discredited Christian based homosexual conversion therapy


Undercover investigation prompts British Medical Assn. to call for ban of discredited, harmful gay conversion therapies


American Psychological Association declares gay-to-straight therapy is harmful and doesn't work


Fundamentalist "Truth Academy" indoctrinating teens to fear and fight homosexuals as a threat to religious freedom


Malaysian education officials send Muslim boys identified by teachers as effeminate to anti-gay counselling camp


UK government insists it will not accept free school proposals from groups pushing creationist agenda over science


UK education reforms open door for untrained teachers in faith schools to indoctrinate children with creationism


British government amends education bill to allow faith schools to adapt law according to dogma


British humanist campaign challenges state-funded religious schools


Former governor of church school in UK now says state-funded faith schools are immoral


U.K. school inspectors report that Christian theology and non-religious beliefs not being adequately taught in compulsory religious education classes


Faith schools that indoctrinate children commit child abuse


Secularists campaign to change UK law that makes religious assemblies in schools compulsory, government and church resist


Groups call on British government to replace compulsory collective worship in schools with inclusive assemblies


UK theology think tank says it is wrong to exclude God from classroom, superstition and reason should be equal partners



25 Mar 2011

Exclusive Brethren demands apology for discrimination, survivor says cult should apologize for breaking up families


Goulburn Post  -  Australia     March 23, 2011

Former Brethren wants national apology

BY DAVID COLE



MEMBERS of the Exclusive Brethren in Goulburn have demanded an apology from Cr Geoff Peterson for offensive comments he allegedly made to them in a council building on September 23 last year.

It has prompted a former member of the Brethren, also living in Goulburn, to ask for a national apology from them for “ex-communicating” him and separating him from his family.

David Lidgard, of Goulburn, said last week he felt a national apology from the Brethren to him and others was overdue.

“I, along with all others who have been excommunicated from the Brethren should get a national apology from them for how we have been discriminated against,” Mr Lidgard said.

“I want an apology from them on behalf of all who have suffered from their ‘doctrine of separation’, whereby in the past they have excommunicated a person and separated them from their family.

“We talk of the Stolen Generation, who Kevin Rudd apologised to - we ex-Brethren also lost our families.”

Mr Lidgard said he was ex-communicated from the Brethren in 1961 for owning a transistor radio. “I have not had any contact with my parents since I was kicked out in 1961,” he said.

“I was ex-communicated from the Brethren on April 9, 1961 by the late Bruce Hales senior, who was then their Elect Vessel of God, and he instructed my parents that I had to leave the family home - because I had the transistor radio.

“Then three of my other brothers were treated the same. My eldest brother Arthur Lidgard was married with five children and he was excommunicated in 1962. He came home from work to find his wife and children had been removed by Brethren members from the family home.”

Mr Lidgard said his brother’s family was later reunited. He said the current issue with Cr Peterson had brought up personal “stuff” for him.

“I have been out of the Brethren for 50 years, but this opportunity has come up for me to express my opinion of the Brethren to the general public and about what the Brethren do to former members and what they are now doing to our councillor (Peterson),” he said.

“They are making a mountain out of a molehill,” he said.

“As far back as I can remember Brethren women have worn the ribbons in their hair - so what I am getting at is - why are the Brethren making such an issue of it?

“The Brethren should follow the teachings in the bible - such as Matthew 5-39 and Luke 6-29 - that is when someone strikes you on the right cheek you should turn the other cheek and not fight back.” Mr Lidgard said over the years he had written to various MPs, the NSW Anti- Discrimination Board and the Human Rights Commission in relation to his complaints against the Brethren.

This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG:



















Exclusive Brethren schools funded by Australian government allow parents to evade taxes when paying school fees









21 Mar 2011

Philadelphia City Council votes to hold hearings on returning prayer to public schools in violation of constitution



Secular News Daily - March 16, 2011

Philly City Council resolution pushes prayer in public schools

by Freedom From Religion Foundation



The Freedom From Religion Foundation has sent a strong letter of complaint to officials in Philadelphia after the City Council unanimously passed a resolution March 10 that violates the constitutional boundary between state and church.

The resolution, introduced by council member Jannie Blackwell, calls for the council's Committee on Education to hold hearings on prayer in Philadelphia Public Schools. It includes these statements:

Whereas, prayer can promote more virtuous living and may have a positive impact on student behavior in schools; and
Whereas, encouraging students to not only pray for themselves but to pray for others can cause students to think more of their follow classmates then of themselves, to lead lives of thankfulness; and
Whereas, exercising compassion and understanding when engaging with other faith communities is important to achieve harmony and right relationships with others including students, teachers, parents, school administration and community leaders; and
Whereas, we support students who have an interest in their faith; and
Whereas, we encourage all students to use their faith in their daily living and when necessary to keep a positive attitude and give their best in school to ensure a bright future.

FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor, in a March 15 letter on behalf of the Foundation's 16,200 members, including 550 in Pennsylvania, called the measure "a shamelessly overt attempt by a city government to promote prayer and religion to public school students. Nonbelievers take umbrage at Blackwell’s unfactual assertion that religious students are 'more virtuous,' " Gaylor wrote.

"A city government may not play favorites based on citizen faith or lack thereof, or take sides on matters which must be left to individual conscience," Gaylor said.

"It is absolutely beyond the purview of any government body or official to encourage 'students to not only pray for themselves but to pray for others' and to say such students 'think more of their fellow classmates' and 'lead lives of thankfulness,' much less to 'encourage all students to use their faith in their daily living [emphasis added]. All students are not religious. The Philadelphia City Council is offending large numbers of young people and their parents with such inappropriate pronouncements."

Gaylor also noted some Philadelphia history, the "prayer riots" of 1844 in which Protestants and Catholics took up arms against each other, with at least 30 people killed, after Catholic Bishop Francis Kenrick petitioned the School Board to let Catholic children read the Catholic bible.

"What other lesson is needed to show that religion has no place in Philadelphia Public Schools?" Gaylor asked.

She also cited a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision against prayer and religion in public schools that originated in the Philadelphia area. In Abington Township School District v. Schempp in 1963, the court overturned a Pennsylvania law that mandated bible reading and the recitation of the Lord’s Prayer.

"That case was bravely fought by the Schempp family," Gaylor noted. "Ellery Schempp, now a Lifetime Member of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, was disciplined as a high school student when he attempted to protest the unconstitutional actions of his school district. Every morning as pupils attended their home rooms, religious exercises were broadcast into each room in the school via the PA system, with select students reading 10 verses of the bible, followed by recitation of the Lord’s Prayer, not only over the PA system but by students in the various classrooms, who were asked to stand and join in repeating the prayer in unison. The Supreme Court, in declaring such actions unconstitutional, sagely noted:

The place of religion in our society is an exalted one, achieved through a long tradition of reliance on the home, the church and the inviolable citadel of the individual heart and mind. We have come to recognize through bitter experience that it is not within the power of government to invade that citadel, whether its purpose or effect be to aid or oppose, to advance or retard. In the relationship between man and religion, the State is firmly committed to a position of neutrality.

"The court continues in a series of strong decisions to shoot down every attempt by government or outside influences to influence students to pray," Gaylor said, also citing McCollum v. Board of Education, Engel v. Vitale, Stone v. Graham, Wallace v. Jaffree, Lee v. Weisman, and Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. Students are already free "to pray alone" in school without any resolution or encouragement by the council or school, Gaylor said. "And the federal Equal Access Act already permits bible clubs and devotional student clubs to meet in public schools that allow nonacademic student clubs. But the rest of this resolution written by Jannie L. Blackwell clearly seeks to influence and reward public school students who pray vocally and in groups and otherwise parade piety in front of other students, in a manner that the Jesus of the New Testament so expressly condemned as false and hypocritical (Matthew 6:5-6).

"Already the Philadelphia school day includes 'one minute of silent meditation.' Already the Philadelphia school day opens with the religious Pledge of Allegiance, a pledge which Congress tampered with in 1954, divisively inserting the words 'under God' in a formerly secular oath. The national Freedom From Religion Foundation in its 33 years of existence has received countless complaints from students who have been reprimanded, shunned or disciplined for opting out of participation in a pledge which distastefully links piety to patriotism," Gaylor said.

"We question why a City Council facing an unprecedented economic crisis — high unemployment and joblessness, foreclosures and citizens in desperate need of practical benefits — would misdirect precious time and resources in a diversionary and divisive attack upon respect for secular principles in Philadelphia Public Schools? What can be the intent and meaning of the City Council calling for 'hearings on prayer in Philadelphia public schools' if not to impermissibly advance religion, inflame passions and interfere with students’ First Amendment right to believe, or disbelieve, as they desire?"

FFRF called on the council to rescind its unlawful resolution.

Contact information:

Anna C. Verna, City Council President
Members of the City Council
City Hall, Room 405
Philadelphia PA 19107-32
anna.verna@phila.gov

School Reform Commission
440 North Broad Street
Suite 101
Philadelphia, PA 19130
druggiano@philasd.org

Freedom From Religion Foundation , based in Madison, Wis., is a national association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics) that has been working since 1978 to keep church and state separate.


This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG:




Islamic scholar says Utah schools doing better job teaching students about all religions


Arkansas politician wants public schools to indoctrinate students with literal interpretation of the Bible








The Alberta town where all public schools force Catholic dogma on non-Catholic students


Virginia school board takes down 10 Commandments posters to avoid lawsuit, students walk out in protest


Texas school board members injected their personal religious beliefs into social studies curriculum


Reactionary Christian fundamentalists take over Texas school board, rewrite history books to indoctrinate America's children


Teen tells hearing Louisiana Science Education Act is embarrassing, students deserve to be taught proper science


Louisiana school board wants believers to teach creationism in science classes, thinks it will solve discipline problem


Teaching evolution in science classrooms under attack in the US and UK by anti-science creationists


Creationists weaken U.S. education system, only a quarter of high school students adequately taught evolutionary biology


Ohio school district payed nearly a million dollars to fire science teacher who taught creationism


Nebraska education administrators get mixed messages from lawyers on legality of promoting religion in schools


Federal Court of Appeal asked to stop California college proselytizing and imposing religion on students


Advocacy group battles illegal Christian fundamentalist proselytizing in U.S. public schools


Fundamentalist Christian 'punk' band uses deception to evangelize and indoctrinate in U.S. schools


Radical Christian extremists aim to undermine public education by targeting high school kids for indoctrination into fundamentalist worldview


Canadian fundamentalist Christian universities promote religious extremism over knowledge








14 Mar 2011

Edmonton mural celebrates Catholic bishop's role in the horrific abuse of aboriginal children in residential schools



Edmonton Journal - Canada February 12, 2011

Mural at LRT station offensive, rider says

The late Bishop Grandin's links to residential schools, colonialism don't merit celebration

BY MUSTAFA FAROOQ  |  FREELANCE



I have a secret to admit: I love the LRT. I know some people hate it, complaining endlessly about how, in bigger cities, the subways never come late, but I personally love the feeling of crossing over the North Saskatchewan River in the LRT and seeing our beautiful city from the river valley. Recently, however, I had to get off at Grandin/Government Centre station to run an errand, and my love affair with the LRT hit a major road bump.

Having just left a class recounting the impacts of the residential schooling system on aboriginal people in Alberta, I was horrified at seeing the mural in Grandin station. Called the Bishop Vital Grandin Mural, the artwork is a celebration of residential schooling and aboriginal displacement and a historical narrative of colonialism and conversion.

Bishop Grandin was an early Catholic pioneer who arrived in Canada in 1854. He was, indeed, a seminal figure in Alberta history, but one of his most significant "contributions" was as an overseer of numerous residential schools.

To quote from a study by the University of Toronto, during the later part of the 19th century, Grandin became convinced that "attempts to civilize and evangelize native adults would have negligible results" and it would be more prudent instead to "wean children from their native lifestyle." Thus, it was because of Grandin's work that schools such as St. Joseph's at Dunbow near Calgary were set up. Today, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, working to alleviate the pain and suffering caused by the residential school system, recognizes many of Grandin's "civilizing projects," such as St. Joseph's, as residential schools, where Blackfoot children were taken away from their families and forced into an abusive system.

In a bizarre twist, though, the mural at Grandin/ Government Centre, far from decrying that history, seems to revel in it. On the accompanying plaque, which includes the signature of the City of Edmonton, it claims Grandin was a pioneer, upon whose arrival "the West was a vast wilderness." That would make sense, if the aboriginal people who had been living in Alberta for centuries before Grandin arrived were just a part of a background "wilderness" of assorted animals; indeed, according to the mural, the aboriginal people had no civilization of their own and had to thus be civilized.

In the mural, Grandin looks ahead, staring bravely into the future. Beside him, a woman wearing a crucifix holds an aboriginal baby, apparently carrying the infant away from its family. In the background, we see what is presumably the family, faceless, being escorted by another missionary to train stations.

Some might say I am misinterpreting the painting. That is possible. But here are the cold, undeniable facts: Grandin helped operate residential schools. In the painting, Grandin's female associate holds an aboriginal child, separated from family. The mural is supposed to be a celebration of this history. The mural is placed in an incredibly important place; the station is the centre for those going back and forth from the Alberta legislature. In a sense, this is a view that is seen as legitimate by the Government of Alberta and by the city. Am I the only one who feels nauseated by this?

The residential school system might be dead, but the Grandin mural continues to sing its praises in the heart of Edmonton.

Mustafa Farooq is a third-year political science honours student at the University of Alberta.

This article was found at:


**********
Edmonton Journal  -  Canada  February 17, 2011

Grandin deserves a mural

BY JULIETTE CHAMPAGNE



Re: "Mural at LRT station offensive, rider says; The late Bishop Grandin's links to residential schools, colonialism don't merit celebration," by Mustafa Farooq, Ideas, Feb. 12.

Mustafa Farooq is nauseated by the Grandin mural at the LRT station? Thankfully, times have changed, but it is only very recently that rightful recognition has been given to the indigenous peoples of the world, even by our federal government.

Bishop Vital Grandin was part of a civilization that considered its way of life as best of all, an unfortunate characteristic of humanity. At the time, this colonial view was wholeheartedly supported by the Canadian government.

Remember how Chief Sitting Bull was treated? In fact, it was because of federal policies that the use of indigenous languages was discouraged in schools, policies Grandin had to submit to as well. In fact, scholars have shown that Grandin's proposed method of educating the native peoples of the Canadian northwest was categorically rejected by the federal government and that he had to base his schools on the federal model.

It was through individuals such as Grandin and other religious communities that health care, social assistance and education were brought to this part of the world, when there was no social safety net other than charity.

Who do you think cared for the sick of St. Albert during the 1870 smallpox epidemic, when, out of a population of 700, 300 died?

The oblates and the Grey Nuns helped nurse the sick and bury the dead. Grandin was there, helping and often weeping at the bedside of the dying. He had come through Fort Carleton when smallpox had struck and spent some time there caring for the sick. He returned to St. Albert to help and, upon learning that smallpox was devastating the Métis hunters and their families on the Prairies, he joined them there too, comforting, helping and doing what he could.

Granted, perhaps the mural should be reinterpreted, but it is much too easy to pin the blame for the residential schools on one individual.

Juliette Champagne, PhD, history, Edmonton

This article was found at:


***************
Edmonton Journal  -  Canada   February 21, 2011

We don't need reminders

BY ELIZABETH LIGHTNING



Re: "Grandin deserves a mural," by Juliette Champagne, Letters, Feb. 17 and "Mural at LRT station offensive, rider says; The late Bishop Grandin's links to residential schools, colonialism don't merit celebration," by Mustafa Farooq, Ideas, Feb. 12.

Juliette Champagne ends her glowing letter with the words, " . much too easy to put the blame for the residential schools on one individual."

As a survivor of a residential school run by oblates, I am concerned about this mural, because it focuses on an individual and therefore misrepresents Canadian/native history.

Regardless of good works, Grandin was part of a system that perpetrated horrendous damage and suffering to native people. Whatever might have changed in Champagne's view, nothing can ever erase the cultural loss and psychological, physical and sexual abuse that occurred in these schools, precisely because the intergenerational effects still exist in native communities. This kind of history does not change, nor can it be forgotten, but neither should we be continually confronted by stereotypical images of our colonial past.

Maybe Grandin deserves to be honoured by his supporters, but do we have to have a mural in a public place, such as an LRT station? Mustafa Farooq provides evidence that images are all powerful and I appreciate his insight in this matter.

Elizabeth Lightning , PHD , Education , Edmonton

This article was found at: 


**********************
Edmonton Journal  -  Canada   March 1, 2011

Grandin mural about living in harmony: artist

by Sylvie Nadeau, artist, author and copyright owner of the Grandin mural



RE: "Mural at LRT station offensive, rider says; The late Bishop Grandin's links to residential schools, colonialism don't merit celebration," by Mustafa Farooq, Ideas Feb. 12, and "Grandin deserves a mural," by Juliette Champagne, Letters, Feb. 17.

"I was horrified at seeing the mural in Grandin Station," said Mustafa Farooq.

In answer to that, never in my wildest dreams have I thought a spiritual journey and love-based masterpiece would find itself the object of controversy and even horrify someone.

A big thank you to Juliette Champagne, PhD history, for adjusting everyone's glasses (including mine), and giving us a clearer and more global picture of this phase of our history.

This mural was commissioned by the French Association of Alberta and created in 1989 to be offered as a gift to the City of Edmonton.

The mural was to express the journey of Bishop Grandin, his impact on our history, his relationship with our indigenous people, the contribution of the Grey Nuns, the treaties, the advent of the train and its impact on church and school locations and so on.

The late Bishop Grandin does deserve respect; so do the Grey Nuns and so does every indigenous person depicted in this mural.

This mural is about love, compassion, learning to live and build in harmony together, through mistakes if we must, a future that respects us all.

This painting is not about a woman with a crucifix, taking away a child from its parents. It's about the love, the caring and compassion for the smaller of us, protecting and helping to be part of that.

This is the spirit in which I painted this Grey Nun and the child she is holding. The child is at peace and content.

Look at every person in this painting: they have respect and self-respect.

There is more wisdom in the old wise man (indigenous person) looking into the scene, over the treaties than words can say. Only the future will tell us the results.

There is self-respect and respect of one's destiny in the indigenous woman standing by the boat in the same panel as the elderly, both looking at the train, the fort and the church there.

Look at the love in each stone that built the Grandin School, the cathedral, the church; like each step of our history, I discovered something beautiful in mankind's creation and its spirit at every stroke of the brushes, for just being more present and finally paying attention.

You might say we have paid the price to be where we are today, to be standing side by side.

As the last three panels say: we must build in harmony a present leading to a better future, not for, but with, our children, and this should be done block by block.

I speak, not to criticize, but to express the spirit in which I painted it, and what it symbolizes.

This article was found at:

Edmonton Journal  -  Canada   March 8, 2011

Rose-coloured view lost on abuse victims

by Donita Large , residential schools adviser, Sherwood Park



Re: "Grandin mural about living in harmony: artist," by Sylvie Nadeau, Letters, March 1.

Artist Sylvie Nadeau, in describing residential schools, says, "This painting is not about a woman with a crucifix, taking away a child from its parents. It's about the love, the caring and compassion for the smaller of us, protecting and helping to be part of that. This is the spirit in which I painted this Grey Nun and the child she is holding. The child is at peace and content."

As a First Nations educator and a residential schools adviser, I have heard residential school victims consistently recount their experience of being forcibly taken away from their parents.

Being ripped from your birth family will hardly leave a child with peace and contentment in the arms of a Grey Nun.

Were there nice Grey Nuns? I am sure there were, but many Grey Nuns are also named as abusers in thousands of current residential school claims through the Indian Residential Schools Independent Assessment Process -nuns who were not parents, but guards who ruled and abused by using religion as a weapon of guilt and fear.

I don't think these indigenous children, who are now adults, would look at this mural and hold Nadeau's sentiments.

Juliette Champagne (Letters, Feb. 17) says it is "much too easy to pin the blame for the residential schools on one individual."

This is correct and I do not think anyone is saying Bishop Grandin is solely responsible.

He was, however, a part of a system that was specifically designed to eradicate the Indian in the child through legislated domination.

He was a bishop, which meant he had power and authority in this era and would have been privy to the atrocities occurring in the schools.

Perhaps Ottawa can commission an artist to create a mural that puts a positive spin on internment camps in Canada, as a lesson of building harmony through mistakes as well.

According to Nadeau, all you need to do is paint each person showing respect and self-respect even if the act itself was given an apology by the federal government, as it was wrong.

Bishop Grandin has no doubt contributed to Edmonton's and Alberta's history. If the mural had been created with the intention of honouring the victims of residential schools and the impact on the people, then there could be some respect in that choice.

But to create an image of residential schools through rose-coloured glasses perpetuates ignorance of a dark and painful past for many victims.

So it appears Mustafa Farooq's (Ideas, Feb. 12) disgust was warranted. The Grandin mural does continue to sing the praises of residential schools in the heart of Edmonton.

A mural honouring Grandin for railroads seems reasonable, but not residential schools.


This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES:




Jesuits pay record settlement for decades of psychological abuse and rape of over 450 Native American children




Nuns among worst perpetrators of horrific violence and sex abuse in Jesuit-run schools and missions on Indian reservations



Canadian Indian residential school hearings identify thousands of abusers including some students who were also abused


Survivors of Indian residential schools need to tell their stories to restore self-worth after trauma of abuse


A brief history of Canadian residential schools designed to indoctrinate and assimilate aboriginal children


Canadian Truth Commission investigates fate of thousands of aboriginal children who died in mysterious circumstances


Canadian residential school Truth Commission begins to address over a century of child abuse, thousands of children still missing


‘Apology? What apology?' Church’s attempt at reconciliation not enough, says counsellor


Church-run Canadian residential schools denied human rights to all aboriginal children in their custody


'This Is How They Tortured Me' [book review]


Mothers of a Native Hell


Red Cross emergency mission to Indian reservation exposes Canadian apartheid



Fugitive priest hiding in Belgium and Lourdes, France sent back to Canadian territory Nunavut to face sex abuse charges


Canadian priest convicted of pedophilia, wanted by Interpol for 15 years, surrenders in Belgium but authorities let him go


Pope expresses 'sorrow' for abuse at residential schools - but doesn't apologize


When will church learn lessons about abuse scandals?


NOTE: THE COMMENT SECTION BELOW CONTINUES THE COMMENTING AT THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IN THIS ARCHIVE:


Canadian Indian residential schools designed to assimilate natives traumatized individuals and generations



28 Feb 2011

Virginia school board vows to spend public money fighting costly law suit over Ten Commandments in schools



The Washington Post - February 17, 2011

Ten Commandments in school stirs fight in Va. district


By Kevin Sieff  |  Washington Post Staff Writer



PEARISBURG, VA. - Nearly 12 years ago, in the aftermath of the shootings at Columbine High School, officials quietly posted the Ten Commandments on the walls of Giles County public schools. It was a natural reaction, said residents of this rural county peppered with churches, to such an alarming moral breakdown.

There the commandments stayed, within nondescript frames that also featured the first page of the U.S. Constitution, stirring little controversy until December. That's when an anonymous complaint prompted the superintendent to order the removal of the displays. The decision sparked such passionate community backlash that the county school board voted to post them again in January.

Now the fight appears headed to the courts as residents of Giles County, along Virginia's rugged, pious southwestern spine, fight what they call mounting pressure from Washington and Richmond to secularize their public institutions. The district also runs a so-called "Bible Bus" so that students can get privately organized Christian instruction off site during the middle of the school day.

"The commandments have been a compass for our lives," said Jared Rader, principal of the county's Macy McClaugherty Elementary School. "It's something that the county feels strongly about, something we think our children should learn from."

The commandments are featured on 81/2-by-11-inch pieces of paper in six schools, generally hung on white cinder block near main entrances and hallways.

School officials say the displays should be legal because the commandments are a historical document, included as part of a monument to the principles - some of them relgious - on which the country was founded.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation disagree. They plan to file a lawsuit on behalf of two plaintiffs, who have asked the court to withhold their names for fear of retribution.

"The school board is ignoring a core principle our country was founded on. Apparently they've never heard of the First Amendment or the Bill of Rights," said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, which describes itself as a national organization of atheists and agnostics. "And they're using our schoolchildren as pawns."

The displays were the idea of a Giles County pastor, and they have generated objections on at least one other occasion. In 2004, Sarah McNair, Giles High School senior, sent letters to county politicians, calling the display of the commandments an infringement on her rights and a "serious issue that cannot be ignored."

Both Virginia's secretary of education and the superintendent of public instruction dismissed her concerns, said McNair, now 24, who moved from Fairfax to Giles County.

But when the issue flared again, in December, school officials consulted with legal counsel and decided to remove them. Yet when students learned that the commandments had been removed, they distributed hundreds of photocopies of the edict, pasting them on lockers around the school. Weeks later, the halls were still papered with makeshift scrolls, next to photos of football players and fliers advertising sketch comedy routines.

"This whole thing just makes me feel small," said Kearsley Dillon, 16, a sophomore who helped distribute the commandments. "I have my faith and that's the most important thing to me. But this is really discouraging. What can a 16-year-old do?"

The turning point was a raucous school board meeting attended by more than 100 Giles County residents. Hanging the commandments is "a right" and "a blessing" and "a moral obligation," residents said in the public forum.

"We are not Montgomery County, Maryland," resident Judy Lawson said in the crowded room. "We are not Northern Virginia."

By the end of the meeting, the school board had voted unanimously to restore the Ten Commandments. And the Board of Supervisors soon after decided to support the decision, agreeing to help fund the district's legal defense.

"We would rather fight the ACLU or whoever would come up than have one anonymous coward who would not even sign the letter come in and tell us how to run our schools," said Eric Gentry, chairman of the county's Board of Supervisors.

Public displays featuring the Ten Commandments have caused legal clashes for decades. The Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that a Kentucky policy requiring the commandments on the walls of public school classrooms violated the First Amendment. But in 2005, the court upheld the inclusion of the commandments as part of a monument which included 16 other historical documents on the Texas State Capitol grounds.

Scholars say that the 1980 case, Stone v. Graham, will likely preclude the school board from legally displaying the commandments on school grounds. "The school board is making a bet that the Supreme Court will overrule that decision," said Douglas Laycock, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Virginia School of Law. "For a little school board down in the mountains, it's an expensive endeavor."

Although court decisions have underscored the line between church and state, many residents - who are quick to call Giles a "Christian county" - have expressed a desire to fight back against federal and state intrusions.

The county's government buildings feature posters reading "In God We Trust" near their entrances. After the Supreme Court ruled that prayer in school was unconstitutional, the district introduced its weekly "Bible Bus," which facilitates religious classes for most of the county's elementary school students. That initiative is legal, according to local officials, because it's voluntary, and the bus is privately owned and operated.

Elsewhere in the nation, schools are trying to keep religion in public schools - prayers at high school football games and in classrooms, nativity scenes on school property. The Freedom from Religion Foundation every year receives about 300 formal complaints, many of them involving school districts, according to Gaylor.

Yet she called the Giles County case "one of the most egregious we've seen."

In Giles, residents say the Ten Commandments display enjoys nearly universal support among those who grew up in the county. They say only outsiders - such as legal organizations in Richmond and Wisconsin - would question such a core aspect of the culture.

Some consider Jonathan Jochem to be such an outsider. An ACLU member, he moved to Giles County from Chicago 11 years ago and quickly fell in love with the open spaces and the generous people. "They're good Christians in the best sense of the word," he said. "But their knowledge of the Constitution is distorted."

Jochem was shocked when he first heard about the county's Bible Bus, and bothered by the school board's refusal to remove the commandments from public schools. Like several other community members, he supports the ACLU's lawsuit.

But with the current controversy spurred by an anonymous complaint, and a lawsuit expected to be introduced with two anonymous plaintiffs, Giles County residents say they have little reason to believe that there is much of a local fracture.

The debate, said Shahn Wilburn, the pastor who first suggested displaying the Ten Commandments after Columbine, is "Giles County versus Washington. David versus Goliath."

"I know that story," he added. "And I know who won."


This article was found at:


*******************************************************************************

Secular News Daily  -  February 18, 2011

Commandments Clash: Va. County Has One Last Chance To Avoid A Lawsuit – And Should Take It


Rob Boston  | senior policy analyst at Americans United for Separation of Church and State



Public education officials in Giles County, Va., can’t say they weren’t warned.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia and the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) wrote to school officials recently telling them to remove Ten Commandments displays from the schools. The officials were also advised by their own attorney to take down the religious posters.

At first, they did. But when members of the community complained, the school board voted to put the Ten Commandments back into the schools.

The ACLU and the FFRF have warned the officials one last time: They have plaintiffs and are ready to file a lawsuit.

Today’s Washington Post reports that the battle in Giles County began 12 years ago, when school officials decided to post the Ten Commandments in the schools. A high school senior complained in 2004, but local officials ignored her.

The new round of objections is much more serious. Both the ACLU and FFRF have sent warning letters to school officials, pointing out that the school system is in clear violation of a 1980 Supreme Court decision called Stone v. Graham. In that ruling, the high court struck down a Kentucky law that mandated posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools.

The court rightly pointed out that the Ten Commandments are a religious document. They are found in the Old Testament and are clearly designed to impart religious instruction. At least half of them deal strictly with matters of how one ought to practice religion.

When a public school system posts the Ten Commandments, it is taking sides in theological matters that are none of its business. Why should officials in the Giles County schools care if students decide to worship “false gods”? (Exactly which gods are these, anyway? Does the school system keep a list?)

Should school officials get worked up if students bow to graven images? (Does that include a Roman Catholic who venerates a statute of a saint?)

Is it the schools’ job to ensure that students honor the Sabbath? (By the way, which day is that – Friday, Saturday or Sunday?)

Other provisions in the commandments reflect commonsense rules that are found in every religious or ethical tradition. I would hope that officials in Giles County would teach students not to murder, lie and steal even if those things weren’t mentioned in the Ten Commandments.

Giles County school officials didn’t ask for my advice, but here it is anyway: Don’t let this matter go to court. You will lose. These are challenging times for the economy, and I’m sure your school system has better ways to spend taxpayer money than squandering it on a hopeless court battle.

And please do not be swayed by the dulcet promises of slick Religious Right legal groups that vow to defend you for free. Sure, their lawyers will work on their own dime, but when you lose the case your school district will be handed a big, fat bill for the attorneys’ fees of the ACLU and the FFRF. The Religious Right legal group won’t pick up the tab for that.

Finally, I’d like to advise the school board that it needs to get out of the religion business – and I really must insist on this. Just stop. What you are doing is wrong. Deciding what faith (if any) children should learn about is a job for parents, not school officials.

And don’t give me that line about how you’re only trying to improve young people’s ethical behavior. If that’s your goal, you can do it without posting a specific religious document. Personally, I think there are some interesting ethical statements in the Wiccan Rede, the Eightfold Path of Buddhism and even the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher Epictetus. But I suspect you’re not likely to post those, are you?

It’s time for a separation of church and school in Giles County. The fact that these two are jumbled up is apparent in the words of Jared Rader, principal of Macy McClaugherty Elementary School, who told The Post, “The commandments have been a compass for our lives. It’s something that the county feels strongly about, something we think our children should learn from.”

Great. If everyone in the county is so big on the Ten Commandments, I’m sure parents are already teaching their kids about them in the places where it makes sense to do that – at home and at church.

Related articles on Secular News Daily:
This article was found at:



RELATED ARTICLES:



Virginia school board votes to return Ten Commandments to classrooms despite Supreme Court ruling it is unconstitutional


European Court of Human Rights rules crucifixes in Italian schools violates children's religious freedom to believe or not


Texas school board members injected their personal religious beliefs into social studies curriculum


Reactionary Christian fundamentalists take over Texas school board, rewrite history books to indoctrinate America's children


Teen tells hearing Louisiana Science Education Act is embarrassing, students deserve to be taught proper science


Louisiana school board wants believers to teach creationism in science classes, thinks it will solve discipline problem


Teaching evolution in science classrooms under attack in the US and UK by anti-science creationists


Creationists weaken U.S. education system, only a quarter of high school students adequately taught evolutionary biology


Ohio school district payed nearly a million dollars to fire science teacher who taught creationism


Nebraska education administrators get mixed messages from lawyers on legality of promoting religion in schools


Federal Court of Appeal asked to stop California college proselytizing and imposing religion on students


Advocacy group battles illegal Christian fundamentalist proselytizing in U.S. public schools


Fundamentalist Christian 'punk' band uses deception to evangelize and indoctrinate in U.S. schools


Radical Christian extremists aim to undermine public education by targeting high school kids for indoctrination into fundamentalist worldview


Canadian fundamentalist Christian universities promote religious extremism over knowledge


UK theology think tank says it is wrong to exclude God from classroom, superstition and reason should be equal partners


Does religion have any proper role in education?