by Jon Land
Appeal judges today cut the 14-year jail sentence imposed on a foster mother who subjected three children in her care to a "horrifying catalogue of cruel and sadistic treatment".
They said that although Eunice Spry, 64, routinely beat, abused and starved the vulnerable youngsters over a 19-year period, their injuries were not as serious as other cases where lesser sentences had been imposed.
Giving the ruling, Mr Justice Burnett said the part of the sentence which reflected the cruelty and violence should be reduced to 10 years.
Together with the two-year sentence for witness intimidation and attempting to pervert the course of justice, Spry will now serve 12 years.
The devout Jehovah's Witness was sentenced at Bristol Crown Court in March last year after a four-week trial when it was heard that she had forced sticks down the children's throats and made them eat their own vomit and rat excrement.
Mr Justice Burnett, detailing what he called a "catalogue of abuse", said as punishment for misbehaving, Spry would beat the children on the soles of their feet and force them to drink washing-up liquid and bleach.
She even confined one girl to a wheelchair for three years after a car crash in a cynical bid to maximise compensation for the accident.
Spry (pictured) staunchly denied all the claims made against her and insisted the only physical punishment she ever used was "a smack on the bottom".
But the jury convicted her of 26 charges, ranging from unlawful wounding, cruelty to a person under 16, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and witness intimidation when she threatened one of the children who was to give evidence against her.
The three victims, known as Victim A, B and C, all gave evidence describing how their daily routines were punctuated by random acts of bizarre and sadistic violence at the hands of their foster mother.
The abuse was finally discovered after another Jehovah's Witness secretly confronted one of the children about marks to her head caused when Spry rubbed sandpaper over her face.
Trial judge Simon Darwall-Smith told Spry that this was the worst case he had come across in 40 years in law.
The offences took place in two of Spry's homes in Gloucestershire between 1986 and 2005.
"All these children have suffered serious psychiatric damage because of the ordeal that they have endured," said Mr Justice Burnett.
He added: "We have found this case especially difficult to resolve.
"We consider that the sentence of 12 years on account of the cruelty in this case is out of the range which can be inferred as appropriate from previous decisions in this court.
"We are particularly mindful of the fact that in this case the physical injuries could have been much more serious than mercifully they were."
This article was found at:
http://www.24dash.com/news/Communities/2008-09-26-Sadistic-foster-mothers-sentence-for-cruelty-reduced
RELATED ARTICLES ON THIS BLOG
Posts
This sounds about right from what I have seen of their children in the public school system. Why do they send them to a public school when they are not allowed to have a social relationship with those who are not of their religion? This is not a religion of God or Jesus. They are not tolerant or loving towards others and not to their own children. Their practices are mentally abusive and need to watched as close as possible. Having contact with several children belonging to this religion, I can only say that my heart is broken along with their spirits. God help them.
ReplyDeleteI disagree, most of the people I know that are Jehovah's Witnesses are not only kind people who think of others before themselves, i know high intellectual people who work hard and get good grades. Just because one apple is rotten it doesnt mean the whole tree is. To judge someone because of others peoples crimes is highly prejudiced. Before you start judging someone you should talk to them and see their point of view, you never know what you can learn. I feel sorry for ignorant people who love to judge people different from them.
ReplyDeleteNormally, I don't like to approve posts by Anonymous posters. The two posts above are one good reason for that policy -- two opposing views, both by Anonymous. I'm not sure why those two posters feel they need to hide their identity. But since I made an exception for the first post, its only fair I did the same for the second.
ReplyDeleteWhile it seems that everyone online has an opinion (just like ass-holes, everyone's got one!), too many lack the courage to use their real name -- too afraid to stand up for what they think.
Hi ive just read the book and it was so sad what them poor children went through. I know it's wrong to say but all jehovah witness seems to be weird im mean who in there right mind would not give a blood transplant to dying members of there family or babies or children that is a disgrace and also can be very rude to people and ive met a few in my time!
ReplyDelete