TIME - October 3, 2010
Defying the Vatican, Catholic Women Claim Priesthood
By Tim Padgett
Fort Myers - Like any good priest, Judy Lee knows how to use a Bible story. One of the readings for Roman Catholic Masses on a recent Sunday, from the Book of Wisdom, recounts how the Hebrews defied the pharaoh by worshipping God "in secret." That passage resonates at the house in Fort Myers, Fla., where Lee is conducting Mass for 25 Catholics gathered in front of a coffee-table altar in defiance of the Pope. "Rome says you'll be thrown out of the church for being here," says Lee, "because I'm a woman."
Lee, 67, considers herself a validly ordained Catholic priest. The Vatican disagrees. "The Catholic Church ... has no authority to confer priestly ordination on women" because Jesus had no female Apostles, Lee was told in a letter from the local bishop, the Rev. Frank Dewane — who also informed her that she had been excommunicated for ignoring that doctrine. Lee's reply: "Rome can impose all the rules it wants on women, divorced people, gay people. But it can't stop us."
She and the more than 100 other women who claim to be Catholic priests in the U.S. and abroad can thank the church for one thing: its hysterical response to their movement — in July the Vatican branded female ordination a delictum gravius, or grave crime, the same label it has given pedophilia — has elicited enough attention to lift their profile out of the catacombs. As TV-news trucks waited outside, Nancy Corran, 37, took holy orders on July 31 at the Mary Magdalene Apostle Catholic Community, a five-year-old San Diego splinter parish with 150 members. Rome's latest decree, says Corran, "was outrageous even for the church." Says Cathleen Kaveny, a professor of law and theology at the University of Notre Dame: "It's a sign the church knows this isn't going away."
That's the hope of Roman Catholic Womenpriests, a group founded eight years ago in Europe. It has since ordained women like Lee and Corran in more than 20 American states and Canada. Womenpriests and other organizations promoting female Catholic clerics, like the Women's Ordination Conference, don't expect to change Vatican doctrine anytime soon. But their growing following signals that Catholics, already incensed by the never ending clerical sexual-abuse crisis, are losing patience with Rome's refusal to let women into the leadership of a church to which more than 20% of Americans belong. "We're the Rosa Parks of the Catholic Church," says Bridget Mary Meehan, a Womenpriests bishop and former nun. "We no longer accept second-class status in our own religion."
Meehan, 62, once did ministry work that included "everything a priest does," she says — except saying Mass. So in 2006 she was made a priest by a group of German female theologians who four years earlier had been ordained by a renegade cleric — and who were made bishops, they claim, by a sympathetic European bishop whose identity they won't reveal. If true, that Da Vinci Code — like scenario, they argue, gives the Womenpriests the legitimacy of apostolic succession, the priestly line that dates back to Jesus' Apostles.
Like Meehan, most of the almost 80 Catholic women ordained in the U.S. hold advanced religious degrees and have logged years of lay work in the church, from premarriage counseling to serving Communion. Many are married — another doctrinal no-no, since Catholic priests, with rare exceptions, must be celibate — and they often have outside jobs to make ends meet. Mary Magdalene Apostle's pastor, Jane Via, is a San Diego County prosecutor.
They perform baptisms and legally recognized marriages. They say Mass in private homes or sanctuaries lent by Protestant churches. Lee ministers to the homeless of Fort Myers, which has one of the nation's highest home-foreclosure rates. "I was drawn to the strong moral imperative of Catholic social teaching," she says. "That's the doctrine that matters."
Most of the U.S.'s 65 million Catholics consider the church's logic behind the ban on female priests to be as thin as a Communion wafer. In a May New York Times — CBS poll, 59% said they favor ordaining women. Groups like Womenpriests maintain that the New Testament and early Christian art show that women like Mary Magdalene, one of Jesus' most trusted followers, were apostles, priests and bishops before medieval misogyny took hold of the church.
Church leaders deny any sexism and insist that July's delictum gravius statement never meant to compare women's ordination to pedophilia per se. Still, critics feel that in its panic to defend doctrine, the Vatican is forgetting decency. What's more, says Kaveny, Rome's heavy-handedness has "gotten Catholics who had before been largely quiet about this issue saying, We should discuss this again."
Conservative Catholics say this is really about feminist politics, and certainly there is overlap. The Womenpriests use a liturgy that stresses gender neutrality ("In the name of God our Father and Mother ..."), and they don't toe the Vatican line against birth control and abortion, endorsing instead the Catholic tenet of informed individual conscience. They also favor the kind of new-age, Mother Earth music that can grate on even progressive Catholics.
What really spooks Rome, the women say, is their drive to reform an insular, hyper-hierarchical church that betrays early Christianity's more democratic culture — and whose bosses have too often protected pedophile priests. "We don't want to just add women to the structure already there," says Corran. Via, who works with child-abuse victims, notes that the church has excommunicated her but not one pederast cleric. "We can no longer indulge this self-preserving all-male system," she says. Asked why they don't go to the Episcopal Church, which ordains women, they say they won't abandon their religion and its sacraments because of a defective church. "We're leading, not leaving, the church," says Meehan.
It's debatable whether female ordination would help empower the Catholic laity or soften the church's overweening clericalism. Women, after all, know how to abuse authority too. But reform is a key draw for Catholics who attend Womenpriests Masses — and who the church says face excommunication as well. "If you look at the history of Christianity, large-scale reforms always started with small movements like this," says Ray Trybus, 66, a Jesuit-educated lifelong Catholic and dean of psychology at Fielding Graduate University in Santa Barbara, Calif., who attends Mass at Mary Magdalene Apostle. "Women tend to bring a different tenor and perspective that governments and corporations have benefited from and which the priesthood now needs to include."
Numbers may force Rome's hand. Since 1985, the number of U.S. Catholic priests has plunged almost a third, to fewer than 40,000; more than 3,400 American parishes are without a resident priest, up from 1,051. To replenish the ranks, the church will probably let male priests marry before it ever ordains women. But the female priests say this should be about doing the right thing, not just the numerical thing. That's the chant from their makeshift altars — and with an unintentional assist from Rome, they're finally being heard.
This article originally appeared in the September 27, 2010 issue of Time magazine.
This article was found at:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2019635,00.html
RELATED ARTICLES:
Phoenix bishop immediately excommunicates another priest for "grave offense" of ordaining woman, but child abusers are protected
Vatican makes attempted ordination of women a crime worthy of immediate excommunication, but not child sex abuse
The Vatican's Perverted Sense of Justice: Pedophiles Stay in the Church, While Priests Who Ordain Women Are Excommunicated
Negating women at the heart of Catholic church's criminal failure to protect children from abusive priests
How the Catholic Church silences women impregnated by promiscuous priests who get promoted
Tens of thousands of Catholic priests automatically excommunicated for "attempted marriage", while pedophile priests protected
Catholic dissidents protest at Vatican to urge change, Pope calls in priests to celebrate year of priesthood
Catholic hierarchy revisits case of 9 year-old rape victim - abortion providers excommunicated, pedophile priests protected
Some think Catholic crisis is a leadership problem, excommunicated priest thinks its a problem of doctrine
>"To replenish the ranks, the church will probably let male priests marry before it ever ordains women"
ReplyDeleteNot likely. The church will probably ordain married men and never ordain women. Priests will never be allowed to marry as they are already married to the Church.
Why the Pope Hates Nuns
ReplyDeleteBy Adele M. Stan, AlterNet June 1, 2012
In 1979, Sister Theresa Kane was given a very special task. As president of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, an umbrella group for most orders of U.S. Catholic nuns, Kane was asked to deliver four minutes of welcoming remarks, on behalf of American sisters, to the newly elected Pope John Paul II during his first papal visit to the United States. At a gathering inside the grand church in Washington, D.C., known as the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, Kane offered the pope a warm greeting, and then launched into this:
As I share this privileged moment with you, Your Holiness, I urge you to be mindful of the intense suffering and pain which is part of the life of many women in these United States. I call upon you to listen with compassion and to hear the call of women...As women, we have heard the powerful messages of our church addressing the dignity [of] and reverence for all persons. As women, we have pondered these words. Our contemplation leads us to state that the church, in its struggle to be true to its call to reverence and dignity for all persons, must respond by providing the possibility of women as persons being included in all ministries of the church."
All ministries -- including, of course, the priesthood. Her meaning was not lost on the pope or, it seems, his henchmen in cassocks.
Chief among the new pope's enforcers was Joseph Ratzinger, the bishop from Bavaria, whom, three years later, JPII would appoint to the position of prefect for the Congregation of the Doctrine the Faith, an entity once known as the Roman Inquisition. As prefect, Ratzinger soon had his Congregation all but living up to its historical inquisitive reputation as he conducted a jihad against liberal bishops, clerics and nuns in the U.S., and around the world. Today, the former prefect is known as Pope Benedict the XVI, still an enforcer, and one with a long memory.
On April 28, nearly 33 years after Theresa Kane's unprecedented challenge to the pope, the Vatican delivered a verdict against LCWR, the nuns' group led by Kane in 1979: Its members were defying Catholic doctrine, Vatican investigators said, by promoting "radical feminist themes," as well as contradicting church teaching on homosexuality and the no-girls-allowed priesthood. Further, as Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times reported it, "The sisters were also reprimanded for making public statements that 'disagree with or challenge the bishops, who are the church's authentic teachers of faith and morals.'"
As punishment, Cardinal William Levada, who now occupies Ratzinger's old job at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, appointed Archbishop J. Peter Sartain of Seattle to oversee LCWR for up to five years, giving him final say on every speaker at the group's conference and every public utterance made in its name. He'll also revise LCWR's governing statues and oversee the revision of a handbook that, according to the Times, was "used to facilitate dialogue on matters that the Vatican said should be settled doctrine." Links between LCWR and two liberal Catholic groups will also be investigated.
Speaking on CBS This Morning [video] last week, Sister Maureen Fiedler, host of the public radio program, Interfaith Voices, said, "If this were the corporate world, I think we'd call it a hostile takeover."
On Friday, in an unprecedented act of defiance, the LCWR board, after a week of meetings in Maryland on how to respond to both the Vatican crackdown, issued a statement of its members' intention to contest the hierarchy's takeover of their organization. It reads, in part:
Board members concluded that the assessment was based on unsubstantiated accusations and the result of a flawed process that lacked transparency.
continued in next comment...
continued from previous comment:
ReplyDeleteMoreover, the sanctions imposed were disproportionate to the concerns raised and could compromise their ability to fulfill their mission. The report has furthermore caused scandal and pain throughout the church community, and created greater polarization.
The sisters said that LCWR President Sister Pat Farrell and Executive Director Sister Janet Mock would travel to Rome to take up these concerns with the prefect and the bishop he appointed to rule over the sisters, and would then consult with the organization's general membership in August. One option the organization could choose is to disassociate with Rome altogether and reconfigure itself as a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation. The Leadership Conference of Women Religious, according to its Web site, "has approximately 1500 members who are elected leaders of their religious orders, representing approximately 80% of the 57,000 Catholic sisters in the United States."
Theologian Mary E. Hunt, co-director of the Catholic feminist resource center, WATER, told me in a telephone interview from her office in Silver Spring, Md., that the Vatican set its sights on LCWR because, as an organization that is part of the church structure, its members are "canonically vulnerable" -- meaning that they are subject to the law of the hierarchy, known as canon law, as interpreted by its appointed enforcers. Should the group dissolve itself and incorporate as a non-profit, it need only operate within the bounds of U.S. law, under which the religious freedom of its members is guaranteed under the First Amendment.
A Cult of Power
When examined in combination with the recent tantrum taken by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops over the birth control mandate in the health-care reform law signed by President Barack Obama in 2010, Pope Benedict's crusade against the nuns would seem to render the Roman curia and the bishops, above all other things, a cult of misogyny. But that would be too simple a reading. At its heart, the church hierarchy is a cult of power; misogyny is but one tool for the already powerful to ensure that power remains in their possession.
One need only look at the current scandal engulfing the Vatican over dealings at the Vatican bank, and an internecine battle waged by partisans and enemies of Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone. Last week, the pope's own butler was arrested for allegedly having leaked confidential papal correspondence and documents to journalist Gianluigi Nuzzi, author of a just-released book about Pope Benedict.
Then there's the recently revealed pay-offs doled out by Cardinal Timothy Dolan, while he served as Archbishop of Milwaukee, to priests accused of abusing children who agreed not to contest their own defrocking.
The campaign to discredit Bertone is believed to be orchestrated by partisans of his predecessor, who want Bertone out of the way before Benedict dies, in order to prevent him from presiding over the conclave that will elect the next pope. In Dolan's case, he used payouts as a means of preserving his own power while serving as Archbishop of Milwaukee, by getting troublesome priests out of the way. (It seems to have worked; Dolan is now the cardinal archbishop of New York.) Dolan's payola scheme, of course, is but one tiny aspect of the enormous and shameful disaster the hierarchy brought upon itself by covering up the crimes against children committed by more than a few priests over the course of decades -- all in an effort to preserve its own power by maintaining a false appearance of propriety that put countless children at risk.
continued in next comment...
continued from previous comment:
ReplyDeleteWriting at Religion Dispatches, Mary Hunt contends that the Vatican's attack on the nuns isn't simply about nuns -- or women. It's about the laity -- keeping the people of the church from actually claiming them the power granted them during the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, and maintaining the power of the clerics. "The effort to rein in LCWR is meant as much to scare the rest of us into line as to corral the nuns," Hunt writes.
This isn't this first time that the Vatican has sought to silence U.S. nuns. In one famous case, 24 sisters were threatened with expulsion from their orders for having signed a statementthat asserted "a diversity of views" on the subject of abortion existed within the church, including the belief that abortion could sometimes be a moral choice. The ad was sponsored by Catholics for Choice, then under the leadership of Frances Kissling. Cardinal Ratzinger presided over the inquisition.
But this time is different, Hunt contends, because of the role played by nuns in the passage of Affordable Care Act, the health-care reform law initiated by the Obama administration and signed by the president. When the bishops, via the USCCB, sought to to block the legislation, largely because of measures that dealt with coverage of women's reproductive health issues, the administration turned to Sister Carol Keehan, president and CEO of the Catholic Health Association, which represents some 600 Catholic hospitals and 1400 health-care facilities. When Keehan backed the bill, she lent a Catholic imprimatur to the administration's much-contested hallmark piece of law. After Obama signed the bill, he sent Keehan one of the ceremonial signing pens he used to make the bill a law. Keehan's defiance was compounded when a coalition of U.S. nuns penned a letter supporting the law that was signed by leaders of 55 religious orders and umbrella groups, including the Leadership Conference of Women Religious. .
Earlier this year, Sister Keehan stepped up again, when, after the administration announced that Catholic institutions would not be exempt from the law's mandate to employers that their health insurance plans fully cover patients' contraceptive costs, and do so without demanding a co-payment from the patient. After the predictable outcry from the bishops, the administration offered an "accommodation" requiring health insurance companies to pick up the tab for the conception coverage, and Keehan gave her approval.
Nuns Defy Bishops on Health Care; Bishops Cry Foul on 'Religious Freedom'
In choosing the nuns to provide a stamp of Catholic approval for both the health-care law itself and the contraception "accommodation," the Obama administration acted on a calculation that the bishops' hard-core position against contraception and abortion under any circumstances was not supported by the majority of American Catholics, whose views are more in line with those represented by the nuns. The administration's concern was winning buy-in from Catholic lay people -- the voters -- and its legislative strategists knew that the moral imprimatur of the nuns would go a long way to that end. But in executing its strategy, the administration dared to do what no other before it had: expose the powerlessness -- the impotence, if you will -- of the hierarchy when faced with the will of what the church reform documents of Vatican II called "the people of God." The bishops, and presumably the pope, were not amused.
continued in next comment...
continued from previous comment:
ReplyDeleteWhile it's true that the Vatican investigation of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious began nearly four years ago, the timing of the Vatican's announcement of its "hostile takeover" of LCWR coincides with the launching of a barrage of lawsuits against the administration by the bishops and Catholic entities challenging the requirement that all health insurance companies contracted for employer-provided health plans offer contraceptive coverage to the insured, and with no co-payment by the patient. This requirement applies to virtually all employer-provided health plans, including those that cover the employees of Catholic hospitals, universities and other institutions. The timing of the Vatican attack on the nuns also aligns with the timing of a public relations offensive by the bishops that frames the contraceptive mandate as an infringement of religious liberty -- an offensive that includes a heretofore unprecedented attempt at overt political organizing by the clerics for what they're calling a "Fortnight for Freedom," spanning from June 21, which commences the feasts of St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More, through to July 4th.
Sarah Posner, writing at Religion Dispatches, reports:
Fusing the martyrdom of Catholic saints with Independence Day, the Bishops write, "Our liturgical calendar celebrates a series of great martyrs who remained faithful in the face of persecution by political power . . . . Culminating on Independence Day, this special period of prayer, study, catechesis, and public action would emphasize both our Christian and American heritage of liberty."
All of this will of course come to a head as the general election campaign is heating up over the summer months. The Bishops urge commemoration of "resistance to totalitarian incursions against religious liberty" and call on "an immense number of writers, producers, artists, publishers, filmmakers, and bloggers employing all the means of communications—both old and new media—to expound and teach the faith. They too have a critical role in this great struggle for religious liberty. We call upon them to use their skills and talents in defense of our first freedom."
The irony here is that a good part of the problem the Vatican and the bishops are having with their American nuns and parishioners is, in fact, their very Americanness. For the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in Rome, its American flock, as it assimilated into the greater American culture, became increasingly troublesome. American Catholics, often enthusiastic in their patriotism, are, in reality, subject to two different and contradictory faiths: the American civic religion of liberty, individualism and participatory democracy, and the Roman tradition of collective submission to ecclesiastical authority. As time has passed, the American religion in many ways came to surpass the faith tradition of their ancestors in terms of forming a primary set of values. Roman Catholicism, for many, is more a subcultural identity than a daily practice of the rules and rituals mandated by the magisterium.
continued in next comment...
continued from previous comment:
ReplyDeleteAmerican Catholics have long flouted the popes' prohibition on the use of birth control, and are not inclined, as a bloc, to be moved by the bishops' complaint of liberty infringed -- especially when the liberty the bishops claim for themselves is the right to deprive a class of people, who represent half of world's population, of a fundmental aspect of health care particular to that class -- a class that is deemed unworthy by the bishops for admission into their ranks, by dint of the shape their bodies take at birth. Although sexism still thrives in the United States, the average American, even the average American sexist, does not generally classify it as one of the precious religious freedoms for which Americans should lay down their lives.
In the years leading up to the sex-abuse scandal that has gripped the church for more than a decade, many American Catholics viewed the bishops and the popes as simply out of touch with the modern world in matters of sexuality, especially on the reproductive front. But since the scandal, the bishops find themselves widely discredited as it became known that so many were aware of the sexually predatory behavior of some priests toward minors, and acted to cover up the crimes of those clerics. One such bishop was William Levada, who served as archbishop of San Francisco and Portland, Ore., and is now the Vatican prefect in charge of the nuns' persecution.
The nuns, on the other hand, have only grown in moral stature since Vatican II in the eyes of many Catholics, as they seriously implemented the council's mandate to go out into the world and do good works. Today, the most visible Catholic advocates for social and economic justice are often nuns, who work with the poor and minister to the sick. They are, by and large, better educated than the bishops who would rule them, and are consequently often more articulate in expressing their work in the context of their religious values, which they commonly frame in terms of the Gospel's calls to work for justice and healing, rather than as demands for obedience to a power structure whose princes preach adherence to a set of rules that is, at once, cruel and absurd.
Is it any wonder then, that when the Vatican condemned LCWR for, as the New York Times' Laurie Goodstein http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/us/vatican-reprimands-us-nuns-group.html reported, "for focusing its work too much on poverty and economic injustice, while keeping 'silent' on abortion and same-sex marriage," Catholic across the country expressed outrage in demonstrations that took place in some 50 cities?
continued in next comment...
continued from previous comment:
ReplyDeleteVatican Inc.
When Sister Maureen Fiedler described the Vatican's action in the language of big business, she wasn't just being clever. According to Mary Hunt, the Vatican's power structure is very similar to that of a corporation, while the structure of the U.S. coalition of women's religious orders function more on the model of your local food co-op -- very process-oriented and deliberative. Speaking of the Vatican, she told AlterNet: "This is a business, where people do what people do in business."
But with the scandal currently gripping Rome over the pope's leaked correspondence and problems with transparency at the Vatican Bank, and the worldwide disaster of the sexual abuse claims against priests and the bishops who harbored them, Vatican Inc. seems to be treading the path of Lehman Brothers and Enron. The sexual abuse debacle has led to the bankrupting of two archdioceses in the U.S., under the burden of settlements made to victims: Milwaukee, less than two years after Cardinal Dolan became Archbishop of New York, and Portland, Oregon, under the leadership of Cardinal Levada. Such was Levada's brutality, in fact, that he punished a priest who reported a child-abusing fellow priest to the police -- a move that came back to haunt him when the whistle-blower, Father Jon Conley, brought a defamation case against the archdiocese after paving the way for the family of an abused child to win a $750,000 settlement from the archdiocese. (Politics Daily contributor Jason Berry told the sordid tale here in 2010.)
Now head of the church in the city once described by Pope John Paul II as "the capital of the world," Cardinal Dolan is among those charged with making the case for the bishops bogus claim of religious persecution by the U.S. government. But as the U.S. bishops mount their "Fortnight for Freedom" campaign (perhaps better named "Fortnight of Fury"), the Vatican stock would appear to be tanking.
"Roman Catholicism, in its institutional form, is imploding," Hunt told AlterNet.
Some might see in that implosion a divine act of creative destruction. For without the institution, what remains of the church could be simply the "people of God." And in the Gospel of Matthew, that's pretty much how Jesus defined the church.
In its statement, the LCWR board asserted:
[The board] believes that the matters of faith and justice that capture the hearts of Catholic sisters are clearly shared by many people around the world. As the church and society face tumultuous times, the board believes it is imperative that these matters be addressed by the entire church community in an atmosphere of openness, honesty, and integrity.
Read the Vatican document condemning the Leadership Conference of Women Religioushere [PDF].
To view the numerous embedded links in this article go to:
http://www.alternet.org/story/155696/why_the_pope_hates_nuns
Alabama priest who married 18-year-old ousted from priesthood
ReplyDeleteDecision by archbishop on Alex Crow in sharp contrast to decision on different priest who sexually molested multiple boys
by Ramon Antonio Vargas, The Guardian January 10, 2024
The Roman Catholic priest in Alabama who married a recent high school graduate after meeting her through his ministry, fleeing to Europe with her and facing law enforcement scrutiny, has been permanently ousted from the priesthood, a consequence few clergymen ever endure.
Alex Crow’s removal as a priest – known as laicization – by the Vatican had taken effect by 5 January and was confirmed in a letter from the Catholic church’s worldwide leader, Pope Francis, according to an announcement from the archdiocese of Mobile, Alabama.
Mobile’s archbishop, Thomas Rodi, condemned Crow in the announcement for – as he put it – behaving scandalously, and expressed a desire for his local community to “move toward peace after these unsettling events”.
Among other things, the entire saga involving Crow, the young woman and Rodi illustrated how Catholic bureaucrats invoke the possibility of laicization for cases of clerical misconduct on an individual basis.
Rodi was a high-ranking official in nearby New Orleans in 2000 when that city’s archdiocese included him on a letter reinstating a priest who had gone on sabbatical after having admitted to sexually molesting or harassing multiple underage boys whom he met while on duty.
That now-retired priest, Lawrence Hecker, was indicted on charges of child rape, kidnapping and other crimes after being the subject of a Guardian investigation last year. As has been the case with other charged or convicted clerical child rapists, Hecker has never faced expulsion from the priesthood, and there is no indication the church has ever put pressure on him to seek laicization on his own.
One other south-eastern US priest whose laicization was sought by Catholic officials was Travis Clark, who pleaded guilty in November 2022 to a criminal charge of obscenity after a passerby reported him for filming a consensual sexual encounter with two professional dominatrices atop the altar of his Pearl River, Louisiana, church.
continued below
In regard to Crow, an expert in the theological study of demons and exorcism, the Mobile archdiocese suspended him from his clerical duties in late July after he went to Italy with an 18-year-old former student of the McGill-Toolen Catholic high school.
ReplyDeleteCrow, 30, had said he did not intend to return to the US, and the archdiocese charged him with both abandoning his assignment as well as demonstrating behavior “totally unbecoming of a priest”.
Catholic priests make a promise to be celibate. Amid a global, decades-old clerical molestation scandal, the church has also ostensibly sought to implement guidelines meant to establish boundaries between clergymen and their congregants.
The parents of the teen whom Crow met when he volunteered at McGill-Toolen had been unaware she was traveling to Italy with him.
Local sheriff’s office deputies then reviewed allegations that Crow groomed and engaged in sexual misconduct with multiple girls at McGill-Toolen. They found a love letter Crow sent to the young woman he eventually married on Valentine’s Day 2023, when she was 17.
However, authorities later said the local district attorney would not pursue criminal charges, in part citing a lack of cooperation from the young woman who traveled to Italy with Crow.
The pair ultimately returned to Mobile and were married through the civil court system there in November.
Mobile archdiocesan officials said in their 5 January statement that Rodi could have moved to laicize Crow after six months of absence. Crow successfully sought laicization on his own before that period lapsed, and he does not have the option of appealing his subsequent permanent removal from the priesthood, according to the archdiocese’s statement.
Rodi has repeatedly rebuffed suggestions that his archdiocese may have reacted slowly or reluctantly during the investigation of Crow. In its 5 January statement, the archdiocese reiterated it “had no reason to suspect Crow of any crime” but nonetheless “saw no way back to the priesthood for [him], considering his scandalous behavior”.
see the links embedded in this article at:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/10/priest-married-girl-fled-removed-catholic-church